Cited by 101Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersCutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementCancer survivorship and care

Survivorship in Immune Therapy: Assessing Chronic Immune Toxicities, Health Outcomes, and Functional Status among Long-term Ipilimumab Survivors at a Single Referral Center

Open access
Johnson, Douglas B., Friedman, Debra L., Berry, Elizabeth, Decker, Ilka, Ye, Fei, Zhao, Shilin, Morgans, Alicia K., Puzanov, Igor +2 more·2015·Cancer Immunology Research

Abstract

Ipilimumab, a novel immune checkpoint inhibitor, is associated with long-term survival in approximately 20% of patients with advanced melanoma and is also being evaluated in the adjuvant setting. With this growing cohort of survivors, long-term health outcomes, chronic toxicities, and functional outcomes among survivors treated with ipilimumab need to be defined. Using retrospective medical record abstraction, we evaluated disease status, chronic immune- and non–immune-related health events, pharmacologic management of symptoms, and functional status in patients with melanoma, with overall survival ≥2 years following ipilimumab treatment at Vanderbilt University. Ninety patients received ipilimumab for metastatic disease or as adjuvant therapy between January 2006 and September 2012, and 33 patients survived ≥2 years, with a median overall survival of 60.1 months. Of these, 24 patients were alive at the last follow-up (73%), with 14 patients free of disease (42%). Gastrointestinal and dermatologic adverse events were frequent but largely transient. By contrast, patients with hypophysitis universally required ongoing corticosteroids, although largely remained asymptomatic with appropriate hormone replacement. Surviving patients generally had excellent performance status (ECOG 0–1 in 23 of 24). Chronic neurologic toxicities caused substantial morbidity and mortality in 2 patients who received whole-brain radiotherapy >5 years before analysis, and in one patient with chronic, painful peripheral neuropathy. No previously undescribed cardiac, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, hematologic, or neoplastic safety signals were identified. In conclusion, ipilimumab was associated with largely excellent functional outcomes among long-term survivors. Chronic endocrine dysfunction and occasional neurologic toxicity (primarily associated with whole-brain radiation) were observed in a small number of patients. Cancer Immunol Res; 3(5); 464–9. ©2015 AACR.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/2326-6066.cir-14-0217

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease may have somewhat higher risk of irAEs, usually low-grade flares of their pre-existing disease rather than de novo events.

    “Patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease may have somewhat higher risk of irAEs, although these usually relate to increased risks of low-grade flares of their pre-existing disease rather than de novo events.30–32”

    From Endocrine toxicities of immune checkpoint inhibitors (2021) · cites this paper as [31]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnson, D. B., Friedman, D. L., Berry, E., Decker, I., Ye, F., Zhao, S., Morgans, A. K., Puzanov, I., Sosman, J. A., & Lovly, C. M.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Johnson, Douglas B.
Venue
Cancer Immunology Research
Published
2015-05-01
Volume
3
Issue
5
Pages
464-469
ISSN
  • 2326-6066 (ISSN-L)
  • 2326-6074
OpenAlex
W2154441168
Cited by
101
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 2
FWCI
5.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Immunology Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000445)
  • National Cancer Institute (K12 CA 0906525, K12CA090625)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
ipilimumab, immune checkpoint inhibitors, long-term survivors, immune-related adverse events, hypophysitis, whole brain radiotherapy, peripheral neuropathy, endocrine dysfunction, functional status, adjuvant therapy, metastatic melanoma, overall survival, health outcomes
MeSH terms
Ipilimumab, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antineoplastic Agents, Colitis, Diarrhea, Exanthema, Humans, Immunotherapy, Melanoma, Neuralgia, Pituitary Diseases, Pruritus, Treatment Outcome, Disease-Free Survival

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review