Cited by 294Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersTransplantation: Methods and OutcomesRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments

Checkpoint inhibitor therapy for cancer in solid organ transplantation recipients: an institutional experience and a systematic review of the literature

Open access
Abdel-Wahab, Noha, Safa, Houssein, Abudayyeh, Ala, Johnson, Daniel H., Trinh, Van Anh, Zobniw, Chrystia M., Lin, Heather, Wong, Michael K. +4 more·2019·Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) have revolutionized the treatment of cancer, but their use remains limited by off-target inflammatory and immune-related adverse events. Solid organ transplantation (SOT) recipients have been excluded from clinical trials owing to concerns about alloimmunity, organ rejection, and immunosuppressive therapy. Thus, we conducted a retrospective study and literature review to evaluate the safety of CPIs in patients with cancer and prior SOT. METHODS: Data were collected from the medical records of patients with cancer and prior SOT who received CPIs at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center from January 1, 2004, through March 31, 2018. Additionally, we systematically reviewed five databases through April 2018 to identify studies reporting CPIs to treat cancer in SOT recipients. We evaluated the safety of CPIs in terms of alloimmunity, immune-related adverse events, and mortality. We also evaluated tumor response to CPIs. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients with allograft transplantation were identified. The median age was 63 years (range 14-79 years), 74% were male, 62% had metastatic melanoma, 77% received anti-PD-1 agents, and 59% had prior renal transplantation, 28% hepatic transplantation, and 13% cardiac transplantation. Median time to CPI initiation after SOT was 9 years (range 0.92-32 years). Allograft rejection occurred in 41% of patients (11/23 renal, 4/11 hepatic, and 1/5 cardiac transplantations), at similar rates for anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 therapy. The median time to rejection was 21 days (95% confidence interval 19.3-22.8 days). There were no associations between time since SOT and frequency, timing, or type of rejection. Overall, 31% of patients permanently discontinued CPIs because of allograft rejection. Graft loss occurred in 81%, and death was reported in 46%. Of the 12 patients with transplantation biopsies, nine (75%) had acute rejection, and five of these rejections were T cell-mediated. In melanoma patients, 36% responded to CPIs. CONCLUSIONS: SOT recipients had a high allograft rejection rate that was observed shortly after CPI initiation, with high mortality rates. Further studies are needed to optimize the anticancer treatment approach in these patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40425-019-0585-1

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abdel-Wahab, N., Safa, H., Abudayyeh, A., Johnson, D. H., Trinh, V. A., Zobniw, C. M., Lin, H., Wong, M. K., Abdelrahim, M., Gaber, A. O., Suarez-Almazor, M. E., & Diab, A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • Houston Methodist (US)
Corresponding author
Diab, Adi
Venue
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2019-04-16
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
106-106
ISSN
2051-1426 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2938409495
Cited by
294
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 17 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (P30-CA-016672)
  • Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA016672)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Transplantation › Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Keywords
immune checkpoint inhibitors, solid organ transplantation, allograft rejection, immune-related adverse events, anti-PD-1 therapy, CTLA-4 blockade, metastatic melanoma, graft loss, immunosuppression, cancer immunotherapy safety, kidney transplantation, liver transplantation, heart transplantation, T cell-mediated rejection, time since transplantation
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Graft Rejection, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Retrospective Studies, Transplantation, Homologous, Organ Transplantation, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Young Adult, CTLA-4 Antigen, Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review