The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Characterisation of Acute Murine Dextran Sodium Sulphate Colitis: Cytokine Profile and Dose Dependency
Abstract
Background/Aims: In our experience with the acute murine dextran sodium sulphate (DSS) model of experimental colitis, we noted both interstrain and interanimal variations in daily water consumption. One might critically question whether observed differences in injuries are just a dose dependency phenomenon reflecting variations in DSS intake. To clarify this important topic, we performed a dose and concentration dependency study of DSS in Balb/c mice. We also determined Th1 and Th2 cytokine levels to compare the cytokine profile to that from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods: In four groups (14 animals each group) different concentrations of DSS (0, 2.5, 5 and 7.5%) were given for 7 days ad libitum. Mucosal injury of the entire colon was histologically assessed and graded. Cytokine levels were determined by competitive quantitative RT-PCR. Results: A linear increase in the crypt damage score was noted with increasing concentrations (0, 4.9 ± 0.7, 11.9 ± 0.5 and 18.9 ± 1.3, respectively), but the total dose of DSS intake did not correlate with mucosal damage. Progressive upregulation in the transcripts for Th1 cytokines (IL-12, IFN-γ, IL-1, TNF-α) was observed with increasing dosage of DSS. Interestingly, an increase in IL-10, but not IL-4 mRNA transcripts was also noted. Discussion: Acute DSS-induced mucosal injury is dependent on the administered DSS water concentration but not on the consumed DSS dose. The cytokine profile is a classic Th1 response and is similar to that of various inflammatory conditions in the colon. Conclusions: Minor variations in fluid consumption do not affect the severity of DSS-induced injury in mice. The acute murine DSS colitis model is useful for studying the pathophysiological aspects of colonic inflammatory diseases as IBD and for evaluating new potential therapeutic agents
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Immunology of Mucosal Models of Inflammation
Strober, W., Fuss, I. J., & Blumberg, R. S. (2002) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.20.100301.064816 · Cited by 1,304
Investigating Intestinal Inflammation in DSS-induced Model of IBD
Kim, J. J., Shajib, M. S., Manocha, M. M., & Khan, W. I. (2012) · Journal of Visualized Experiments · doi:10.3791/3678 · Cited by 585
Melgar, S., Karlsson, A., & Michaëlsson, E. (2005) · American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00467.2004 · Cited by 578
Interferon-gamma is causatively involved in experimental inflammatory bowel disease in mice
Ito, R., Shin-Ya, M., Kishida, T., Urano, A., Takada, R., Sakagami, J., Imanishi, J., Kita, M., Ueda, Y., Iwakura, Y., et al. (2006) · Clinical and Experimental Immunology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2249.2006.03214.x · Cited by 364
Plasticity of the enteric nervous system during intestinal inflammation
Lomax, A. E., Fernández, E., & Sharkey, K. A. (2005) · Neurogastroenterology & Motility · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2982.2004.00607.x · Cited by 205
Metadata
- Authors
- Egger, B., Bajaj-Elliott, M., MacDonald, T. T., Inglin, R., Eysselein, V. E., & Büchler, M. W.
- Venue
- Digestion
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2000
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 240-248
- ISSN
- 0012-2823 (ISSN-L)
- 1421-9867
- OpenAlex
- W1981190747
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterisation of Acute Murine Dextran Sodium Sulphate Colitis: Cytokine Profile and Dose Dependency. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000007822
- The paper
- Egger, B., Bajaj-Elliott, M., MacDonald, T. T., Inglin, R., Eysselein, V. E., & Büchler, M. W. (2000). Characterisation of Acute Murine Dextran Sodium Sulphate Colitis: Cytokine Profile and Dose Dependency. Digestion. https://doi.org/10.1159/000007822
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.