Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 177

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Donepezil on Cognitive and Global Function in Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease

Homma, Akira, Takeda, Masatoshi, Imai, Yukimichi, Udaka, Fukashi, Hasegawa, Kazuo, Kameyama, Masakuni, Nishimura, Tsuyoshi·2000·Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders

Abstract

This study evaluated efficacy and safety of donepezil hydrochloride (donepezil) at 5 mg/day in patients with mild to moderately severe Alzheimer’s disease for 24 weeks in a double-blind, placebo-controlled comparative trial. In this study, 268 patients were enrolled and 39 of these (15%) were withdrawn. In the evaluable population of efficacy, Protocol-Compatible (PC) analyzed patients (n = 228), better effects than that of placebo were confirmed using two primary efficacy measures: a cognitive performance test, the Japanese version of the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale – cognitive subscale (ADAS-J cog, p = 0.003) and a clinical global assessment, the Japanese version of the Clinical Global Impression of Change (J-CGIC, p = 0.000). The superiority of donepezil was also shown by secondary measures: the Sum of the Boxes of the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR-SB), the Mental Function Impairment Scale (MENFIS) and the caregiver-rated modified Crichton scale (CMCS). The same results were obtained in the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis (n = 263). The incidence of drug-related adverse events was 10% (14/136) in the donepezil and 8% (10/131) in the placebo group; no significant difference was seen between the two groups. The main adverse events were gastrointestinal symptoms, and these were almost all mild, and they all disappeared with continued administration or temporary discontinuation of donepezil. These results indicate that the donepezil appears to be effective and well tolerated in patients with mild to moderately severe Alzheimer’s disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000017259

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 177

Metadata

Authors
Homma, A., Takeda, M., Imai, Y., Udaka, F., Hasegawa, K., Kameyama, M., & Nishimura, T.
Venue
Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2000
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
299-313
ISSN
  • 1420-8008 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9824
OpenAlex
W1575078744
Cited by
177
References
3
FWCI
5.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Donepezil on Cognitive and Global Function in Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000017259
The paper
Homma, A., Takeda, M., Imai, Y., Udaka, F., Hasegawa, K., Kameyama, M., & Nishimura, T. (2000). Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Donepezil on Cognitive and Global Function in Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1159/000017259

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.