Cited by 141

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Predominant Microflora of Nursing Caries Lesions

Marchant, S., Brailsford, S.R., Twomey, A.C., Roberts, G.J., Beighton, D.·2001·Caries Research

Abstract

The predominant microflora recovered from infected dentine of 52 carious teeth from 14 children with nursing caries was determined using both selective and non–selective media for the isolation of specific genera and acidified media (pH 5.2) to isolate the predominant aciduric microorganisms, and compared with the microflora of sound enamel surfaces in caries–free children. Streptococcus mutans formed a significantly greater proportion of the lesion flora while Streptococcus oralis, Streptococcus sanguis and Streptococcus gordonii formed a significantly greater proportion of the plaque flora from sound tooth surfaces. The proportions of Actinomyces naeslundii and Actinomyces odontolyticus were significantly greater in the plaque samples than in the lesion samples. Actinomyces israelii formed 18.2% of the flora from the lesions, but was not isolated from the plaque samples. The proportions of Candida albicans, Lactobacillus spp. and Veillonella spp. were also significantly greater in the carious dentine than in the plaque samples. The most frequently isolated lactobacilli were Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus fermentum and Lactobacillus rhamnosus. The predominant aciduric flora was S. oralis, S. mutans and A. israelii and these taxa were also isolated from a similar proportion of the lesions at pH 7.0. Strains of S. mutans, L. casei, L. fermentum and L. rhamnosus isolated from individual carious teeth were genotyped using PCR–based methods. Each species was genotypically heterogeneous and different genotypes were recovered from different carious teeth in the same child. These data indicate that the microflora of lesions in the same child is microbiologically diverse and support a non–specific aetiology for nursing caries in which the physiological characteristics of the infecting flora, not its composition, is the major determinant underlying the disease process.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000047482

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Streptococcus sanguinis may play an antagonistic role against S. mutans colonization and is usually associated with tooth surfaces free of caries.

    “Several studies showed that Streptococcus sanguinis (S. sanguinis) may play an antagonistic role against S. mutans colonization and is usually associated with tooth surfaces free of caries [43–45].”

    From Saliva microbiome alterations in dental fluorosis population (2023) · cites this paper as [44]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. 10.1128/AEM.66.8.3330-3336.2000 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/sj.bdj.4806033 · DOI
  3. 10.1159/000016631 · DOI
  4. 10.1159/000016487 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1159/000016438 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Marchant, S., Brailsford, S. R., Twomey, A. C., Roberts, G. J., & Beighton, D.
Venue
Caries Research
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2001
Volume
35
Issue
6
Pages
397-406
ISSN
  • 0008-6568
  • 1421-976X
Cited by
141
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review