The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Predominant Microflora of Nursing Caries Lesions
Abstract
The predominant microflora recovered from infected dentine of 52 carious teeth from 14 children with nursing caries was determined using both selective and non–selective media for the isolation of specific genera and acidified media (pH 5.2) to isolate the predominant aciduric microorganisms, and compared with the microflora of sound enamel surfaces in caries–free children. Streptococcus mutans formed a significantly greater proportion of the lesion flora while Streptococcus oralis, Streptococcus sanguis and Streptococcus gordonii formed a significantly greater proportion of the plaque flora from sound tooth surfaces. The proportions of Actinomyces naeslundii and Actinomyces odontolyticus were significantly greater in the plaque samples than in the lesion samples. Actinomyces israelii formed 18.2% of the flora from the lesions, but was not isolated from the plaque samples. The proportions of Candida albicans, Lactobacillus spp. and Veillonella spp. were also significantly greater in the carious dentine than in the plaque samples. The most frequently isolated lactobacilli were Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus fermentum and Lactobacillus rhamnosus. The predominant aciduric flora was S. oralis, S. mutans and A. israelii and these taxa were also isolated from a similar proportion of the lesions at pH 7.0. Strains of S. mutans, L. casei, L. fermentum and L. rhamnosus isolated from individual carious teeth were genotyped using PCR–based methods. Each species was genotypically heterogeneous and different genotypes were recovered from different carious teeth in the same child. These data indicate that the microflora of lesions in the same child is microbiologically diverse and support a non–specific aetiology for nursing caries in which the physiological characteristics of the infecting flora, not its composition, is the major determinant underlying the disease process.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Streptococcus sanguinis may play an antagonistic role against S. mutans colonization and is usually associated with tooth surfaces free of caries.
“Several studies showed that Streptococcus sanguinis (S. sanguinis) may play an antagonistic role against S. mutans colonization and is usually associated with tooth surfaces free of caries [43–45].”
From Saliva microbiome alterations in dental fluorosis population (2023) · cites this paper as [44]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
de Carvalho, F. G., Silva, D. S., Hebling, J., Spolidorio, L. C., & Spolidorio, D. M. P. (2006) · Archives of Oral Biology · doi:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2006.06.001 · Cited by 251
Wang, Y., Wang, S., Wu, C., Chen, X., Duan, Z., Xu, Q., Jiang, W., Xu, L., Wang, T., Su, L., et al. (2019) · mSystems · doi:10.1128/msystems.00450-19 · Cited by 105
Cavalcanti, I. M. G., Del Bel Cury, A. A., Jenkinson, H. F., & Nobbs, A. H. (2017) · Molecular Oral Microbiology · doi:10.1111/omi.12154 · Cited by 62
Oral Microbiomes in Children with Asthma and Dental Caries
Cherkasov, S. V., Popova, L. Y., Vivtanenko, T. V., Demina, R. R., Khlopko, Y. A., Balkin, A. S., & Plotnikov, A. O. (2019) · Oral Diseases · doi:10.1111/odi.13020 · Cited by 26
Saliva microbiome alterations in dental fluorosis population
Liu, S., Song, Q., Zhang, C., Li, M., Li, Z., Liu, Y., Xu, L., Xie, X., Zhao, L., Zhang, R., et al. (2023) · Journal of Oral Microbiology · doi:10.1080/20002297.2023.2180927 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Marchant, S., Brailsford, S. R., Twomey, A. C., Roberts, G. J., & Beighton, D.
- Venue
- Caries Research
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 397-406
- ISSN
- 0008-6568
- 1421-976X
- Cited by
- 141
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review