Cited by 138Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research

Intact physiological response to arousal with impaired emotional recognition in alexithymia

Stone, Linda A., Nielson, Kristy A.·2001·Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics

Abstract

Background The purpose of the present study was to clarify the relationship between the recognition of emotion and physiological response to emotion (i.e. arousal) in alexithymia. Methods This study investigated differences in physiological arousal state, as measured by continuous heart rate, electrodermal activity (EDA) and self-reported emotional intensity before and after exposure to an emotionally arousing or neutral videotape among 41 high- or low-alexithymic young adult participants. Results Across subjects, emotionally negative stimuli produced increased physiological arousal. However, high-alexithymic participants exposed to the arousing videotape did not report increased subjective emotional intensity, as did low-alexithymic participants. In addition, the baseline EDA of high-alexithymic participants was significantly higher than that of the low-alexithymic participants. Conclusions Results support the prediction that alexithymia leads to a decoupling between subjective and physiological arousal when exposed to emotionally negative stimuli. This decoupling may increase alexithymic individuals' risks for stress-related illness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000056232

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals with high alexithymia seem less able to report their state of arousal accurately.

    “Individuals with high alexithymia also seem less able to report their state of arousal accurately (Gaigg et al., 2016; Nandrino et al., 2012; Stone and Nielson, 2001).”

    From Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Stone and Nielson, 2001

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stone, L. A., & Nielson, K. A.
Affiliations
Marquette University (US)
Venue
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2001
Volume
70
Issue
2
Pages
92-102
ISSN
  • 0033-3190 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0348
OpenAlex
W2041896858
Cited by
138
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • e-Publications@Marquette (Marquette University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Marquette University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
Keywords
alexithymia, emotion recognition, physiological arousal, heart rate, electrodermal activity, emotional valence, stress-related disorders, emotional self-awareness
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Affective Symptoms, Arousal, Awareness, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review