Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 347

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Characterization and Immunobiology of House Dust Mite Allergens

Thomas, Wayne R., Smith, Wendy-Anne, Hales, Belinda J., Mills, Kristina L., O’Brien, Richard M.·2002·International Archives of Allergy and Immunology

Abstract

The examination of house dust mite extracts has indicated that over 30 different proteins can induce IgE antibody in patients allergic to the house dust mite. There are however dominant specificities especially the group 1 and 2 allergens which can account for much of the allergenicity of extracts. Of the 19 denominated allergens, the major IgE binding has been reported for the group 1, 2, 3, 9, 11, 14 and 15 allergens. The high-molecular-weight group 11, 14 and 15 allergens have only recently been described and although high IgE binding has been anticipated from immunoblotting, there is a need for considerable corroboration. Similarly, the study of the group 3 and 9 serine protease allergens has been incomplete. The group 4, 5, 7 and 8 allergens have shown intermediate IgE binding and the group 10 tropomyosins are of interest because of their potential cross-reactivity with allergen from disparate species. Although the progress with the production of recombinant group 1 allergens has been recent, many of the allergens can be produced as high IgE-binding polypeptides. The tertiary structure of the group 2 allergens has been determined from recombinant proteins and they are an excellent model for the investigation of modified allergens. An unexpected property of the group 1, 2 and 3 allergens has been the high degree of polymorphism found by cDNA analysis. It has however been possible to identify sequences to represent the variation in the natural allergens. The group 7 and 14 allergens show secondary modifications which vary in different extracts creating batch variation. While some estimate of the importance of allergens can be obtained from IgE binding, few analyses of T-cell responses have been made and these regulate both the development of, and the protection from sensitization.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000065179

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Thomas, W. R., Smith, W.-A., Hales, B. J., Mills, K. L., & O’Brien, R. M.
Venue
International Archives of Allergy and Immunology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2002
Volume
129
Issue
1
Pages
1-18
ISSN
  • 1018-2438 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0097
OpenAlex
W2054386434
Cited by
347
References
2
FWCI
5.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.