Cited by 161

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reverse mosaicism in Fanconi anemia: natural gene therapy via molecular self-correction

Gross, M., Hanenberg, H., Lobitz, S., Friedl, R., Herterich, S., Dietrich, R., Gruhn, B., Schindler, D., Hoehn, H.·2002·Cytogenetic and Genome Research

Abstract

Fanconi anemia (FA) is a genetically and phenotypically heterogenous autosomal recessive disease associated with chromosomal instability and hypersensitivity to DNA crosslinkers. Prognosis is poor due to progressive bone marrow failure and increased risk of neoplasia, but revertant mosaicism may improve survival. Mechanisms of reversion include back mutation, intragenic crossover, gene conversion and compensating deletions/insertions. We describe the types of reversions found in five mosaic FA patients who are compound heterozygotes for single base mutations in FANCA or FANCC. Intragenic crossover could be shown as the mechanism of self-correction in the FANCC patient. Restoration to wildtype via back mutation or gene conversion of either the paternal or maternal allele was observed in the FANCA patients. The sequence environments of these mutations/reversions were indicative of high mutability, and selective advantage of bone marrow precursor cells carrying a completely restored FANCA allele might explain the surprisingly uniform pattern of these reversions. We also describe a first example of in vitro phenotypic reversion via the emergence of a compensating missense mutation 15 amino acids downstream of the constitutional mutation, which explains the reversion to MMC resistance of the respective lymphoblastoid cell line. With one exception, our mosaic patients showed improvement of their hematological status during a three- to six-year observation period, indicating a proliferative advantage of the reverted cell lineages. In patients with Fanconi anemia, genetic instability due to defective caretaker genes sharply increases the risk of neoplasia, but at the same time increases the chance for revertant mosaicism leading to improved bone marrow function.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000069805

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. 10.1126/science.1070174 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1007/s004390000447 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02178-8 · DOI
  4. 10.1073/pnas.051609898 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/nm0896-876 · DOI
  6. 10.1006/geno.1997.4675 · DOI
  7. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19981012)79:5<403::AID-AJMG16>3.0.CO;2-V · DOI
  8. 10.1086/303067 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19990806)85:4<361::AID-AJMG11>3.0.CO;2-E · DOI
  10. 10.1073/pnas.94.24.13051 · DOI
  11. 10.1086/302178 · DOI
  12. 10.1056/NEJM199611213352104 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/356763a0 · DOI
  14. 10.1073/pnas.151260498 · DOI
  15. 10.1007/s004310050896 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/11956 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1007/s100380050107 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Gross, M., Hanenberg, H., Lobitz, S., Friedl, R., Herterich, S., Dietrich, R., Gruhn, B., Schindler, D., & Hoehn, H.
Venue
Cytogenetic and Genome Research
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2002
Volume
98
Issue
2-3
Pages
126-135
ISSN
  • 1424-8581
  • 1424-859X
Cited by
161
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review