The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reverse mosaicism in Fanconi anemia: natural gene therapy via molecular self-correction
Abstract
Fanconi anemia (FA) is a genetically and phenotypically heterogenous autosomal recessive disease associated with chromosomal instability and hypersensitivity to DNA crosslinkers. Prognosis is poor due to progressive bone marrow failure and increased risk of neoplasia, but revertant mosaicism may improve survival. Mechanisms of reversion include back mutation, intragenic crossover, gene conversion and compensating deletions/insertions. We describe the types of reversions found in five mosaic FA patients who are compound heterozygotes for single base mutations in FANCA or FANCC. Intragenic crossover could be shown as the mechanism of self-correction in the FANCC patient. Restoration to wildtype via back mutation or gene conversion of either the paternal or maternal allele was observed in the FANCA patients. The sequence environments of these mutations/reversions were indicative of high mutability, and selective advantage of bone marrow precursor cells carrying a completely restored FANCA allele might explain the surprisingly uniform pattern of these reversions. We also describe a first example of in vitro phenotypic reversion via the emergence of a compensating missense mutation 15 amino acids downstream of the constitutional mutation, which explains the reversion to MMC resistance of the respective lymphoblastoid cell line. With one exception, our mosaic patients showed improvement of their hematological status during a three- to six-year observation period, indicating a proliferative advantage of the reverted cell lineages. In patients with Fanconi anemia, genetic instability due to defective caretaker genes sharply increases the risk of neoplasia, but at the same time increases the chance for revertant mosaicism leading to improved bone marrow function.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In FA, the high incidence of somatic mosaics in up to 10% of patients may point towards a selective advantage of genetically fit wt HSC[56–59].”
From Finding the needle in the hay stack: Hematopoietic stem cells in Fanconi anemia (2009) · cites this paper as [57]
Citations
Cites
Biallelic Inactivation of BRCA2 in Fanconi Anemia
Howlett, N. G., Taniguchi, T., Olson, S., Cox, B., Waisfisz, Q., de Die-Smulders, C., Persky, N., Grompe, M., Joenje, H., Pals, G., et al. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1073834 · Cited by 1,149
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- 10.1126/science.1070174 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s004390000447 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02178-8 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.051609898 · DOI
- 10.1038/nm0896-876 · DOI
- 10.1006/geno.1997.4675 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19981012)79:5<403::AID-AJMG16>3.0.CO;2-V · DOI
- 10.1086/303067 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19990806)85:4<361::AID-AJMG11>3.0.CO;2-E · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.94.24.13051 · DOI
- 10.1086/302178 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJM199611213352104 · DOI
- 10.1038/356763a0 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.151260498 · DOI
- 10.1007/s004310050896 · DOI
- 10.1038/11956 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s100380050107 · DOI
Cited by
Stem Cell Collection and Gene Transfer in Fanconi Anemia
Kelly, P. F., Radtke, S., Kalle, C. V., Balcik, B., Bohn, K., Mueller, R., Schuesler, T., Haren, M., Reeves, L., Cancelas, J. A., et al. (2007) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1038/sj.mt.6300033 · Cited by 180
Finding the needle in the hay stack: Hematopoietic stem cells in Fanconi anemia
Müller, L. U. W., & Williams, D. A. (2009) · Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2009.03.010 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Gross, M., Hanenberg, H., Lobitz, S., Friedl, R., Herterich, S., Dietrich, R., Gruhn, B., Schindler, D., & Hoehn, H.
- Venue
- Cytogenetic and Genome Research
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2002
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 126-135
- ISSN
- 1424-8581
- 1424-859X
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review