The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Caries Progression and Inhibition in Human and Bovine Root Dentine in situ
Abstract
Since the use of bovine instead of human dentine to evaluate cariogenic and anticariogenic substances is not well established, this in situ study was conducted. Eleven volunteers wore palatal acrylic devices containing 4 dentine slabs (2 human and 2 bovine). Sucrose solution (20%) was dripped over all slabs 4 times a day, simulating a cariogenic challenge. Dentifrice slurries, fluoridated or not, were dripped over specified dentine slabs 3 times a day to evaluate caries reduction. After 14 days, the biofilm formed on the dentine slabs was collected for microbiological analysis. In dentine, mineral loss (ΔZ) and lesion depth (LD) were determined by cross-sectional microhardness and by polarized light microscopy, respectively. The total streptococci and mutans streptococci counts in the biofilm formed either on human or on bovine slabs, whether treated or not with fluoride dentifrice, were not statistically different. The ΔZ and the LD values of dentine treated with fluoride dentifrice were significantly lower than the values of dentine treated with non-fluoride dentifrice. The differences in the ΔZ and LD values between the human and bovine dentine were not statistically significant. The results suggest that bovine dentine can be used instead of human to evaluate caries development and inhibition.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The use of surface hardness as an indicator of dentine mineral loss has been widely employed because there is a high correlation with transversal microradiography, which directly quantifies demineralization in dental enamel and also in dentine.
“About the use of surface hardness as indicator of dentine mineral loss, it has been widely employed [25, 33, 34, 36, 39, 56–59] because there is a high correlation with transversal microradiography [25], which directly quantifies demineralization in dental enamel and also in dentine [60].”
From Validation of a Cariogenic Biofilm Model to Evaluate the Effect of Fluoride on Enamel and Root Dentine Demineralization (2016) · cites this paper as [39]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- 10.1159/000059331 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1159/000047429 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1159/000057864 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/000163599428580 · DOI
- 10.1159/000047440 · DOI
- 10.1159/000016629 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0003-9969(73)90109-X · DOI
- 10.1016/0109-5641(93)90119-B · DOI
- 10.1159/000047469 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fernández, C. E., Tenuta, L. M. A., & Cury, J. A. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146478 · Cited by 74
Self-citationEffect of sucrose on biofilm formed in situ on titanium material
Souza, J. G. S., Cury, J. A., Ricomini Filho, A. P., Feres, M., Faveri, M. D., & Barão, V. A. R. (2019) · Journal of Periodontology · doi:10.1002/jper.18-0219 · Cited by 41
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hara, A. T., Queiroz, C. S., Paes Leme, A. F., Serra, M. C., & Cury, J. A.
- Venue
- Caries Research
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 339-344
- ISSN
- 0008-6568
- 1421-976X
- Cited by
- 99
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review