Cited by 12

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Microglia in Fetal and Adult Human Brain Can Be Distinguished from Other Mononuclear Phagocytes through Their Lack of CD163 Expression

Rezaie, Payam, Male, David·2003·Neuroembryology and Aging

Abstract

From the introduction: Recently, a new 130- to 140-kD glycoprotein designated as CD163 (also known as M130, p155 or haemoglobin scavenger receptor) has been described to show expression restricted to the plasma membrane of human monocytes and monocyte-derived macrophages. Expression of this protein can be markedly up-regulated by anti-inflammatory agents, but is either not influenced or reduced by pro-inflammatory factors. CD163 can be detected on tissue sections by immunohistochemistry with the antibodies GHI/6, Ber-MAC-3, Ki-M8, RM3/1 and SM4. In a follow-up to our previous works, we investigated the expression of this marker in the human brain during fetal development and in the adult, using the monoclonal antibody Ber-MAC-3 (1:20 dilution, DakoCytomation Ltd., UK, DAKO ABC-HRP method). Here, we have shown that CD163 selectively identifies a population of mononuclear phagocytes termed 'perivascular cells' intimately associated with cerebral blood vessels in the normal adult human brain. In the human fetal brain, CD163 is expressed by mononuclear phagocytes in the choroid plexus and on cells in the meningeal layers and in the subpial granular layer. However, this marker is largely absent or undetectable on parenchymal microglia, including in certain neurodegenerative disorders (Alzheimer's disease, diffuse Lewy body disease, and multiple sclerosis; data not shown).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000074192

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. 10.1038/35051594 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1159/000028105 · DOI
  3. 10.1159/000068498 · DOI
  4. 10.1159/000051020 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/0166-2236(90)90020-B · DOI
  6. 10.1016/0165-5728(90)90061-Q · DOI
  7. 10.1016/0165-5728(93)90179-3 · DOI
  8. 10.1073/pnas.111152498 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1136(199609)18:1<1::AID-GLIA1>3.3.CO;2-I · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S0006-8993(98)00618-0 · DOI
  11. 10.1097/00062752-200001000-00002 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rezaie, P., & Male, D.
Venue
Neuroembryology and Aging
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2003
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
130-133
ISSN
  • 1661-3406
  • 1661-3414
Cited by
12
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review