Cited by 34

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Differentiation, Ramification and Distribution of Microglia within the Central Nervous System Examined

Rezaie, Payam, Male, David·2002·Neuroembryology and Aging

Abstract

The central nervous system contains several populations of mononuclear phagocytes. Principal amongst these are the tissue-resident microglia. These cells are considered to derive from circulating blood progenitors that colonise the developing human nervous system in the second trimester of fetal life. They first appear as amoeboid forms and gradually differentiate to process-bearing ‘ramified’ forms with maturation. Signals driving this transformation are known to be partly derived from astrocytes in vitro, and amoeboid microglial cells progressively ramify when co-cultured with astrocytes, mirroring the ‘differentiation’ of microglia in situ during development. In the adult, microglia occupy distinct non-overlapping territories in their ramified conformations, and are capable of ‘dedifferentiating’ to their activated amoeboid morphological states in a number of pathological circumstances. This is in keeping with the capacity of these cells for a rapid response to inflammatory cues in the CNS. The interchangeable morphological continuum of these cells supports the view that microglia represent a single heterogeneous population of resident mononuclear phagocytes capable of marked plasticity. This review will discuss signals that drive the colonisation, differentiation and ramification of microglia, and examines hypothetical models for their spatial distribution in the adult nervous system.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000051020

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 9 references

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. 10.1016/0166-2236(88)90110-5 · DOI
  2. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0029(19990615)45:6<359::AID-JEMT4>3.0.CO;2-D · DOI
  3. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1136(199802)22:2<180::AID-GLIA9>3.3.CO;2-O · DOI
  4. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1998.00379.x · DOI
  5. 10.1016/0006-8993(94)91525-3 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/0165-3806(91)90231-7 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/0963-6897(95)00021-O · DOI
  8. 10.1056/NEJM199804163381605 · DOI
  9. 10.1097/00062752-200001000-00002 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/s004290050280 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/0165-3806(90)90203-B · DOI
  12. 10.1016/0165-3806(93)90213-T · DOI
  13. 10.1002/1098-1136(200010)32:1<91::AID-GLIA90>3.0.CO;2-X · DOI
  14. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2000.0751060.x · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0168-0102(99)00041-3 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1136(199612)18:4<319::AID-GLIA6>3.0.CO;2-S · DOI
  17. 10.1016/0006-8993(90)90317-5 · DOI
  18. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1136(199612)18:4<269::AID-GLIA2>3.0.CO;2-T · DOI
  19. 10.1006/exnr.1996.0038 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/0306-4522(91)90267-R · DOI
  21. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1136(199810)24:2<198::AID-GLIA5>3.3.CO;2-S · DOI
  22. 10.1016/0006-8993(91)91302-H · DOI
  23. 10.1016/0165-5728(90)90094-4 · DOI
  24. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4547(19990615)56:6<644::AID-JNR10>3.3.CO;2-0 · DOI
  25. 10.1002/1096-9861(20010305)431:2<217::AID-CNE1066>3.0.CO;2-T · DOI
  26. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1136(199910)28:1<49::AID-GLIA6>3.0.CO;2-V · DOI
  27. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.58.1.45 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/0168-0102(96)01021-8 · DOI
  29. 10.1083/jcb.119.3.493 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1016/0165-5728(94)90156-2 · DOI
  31. 10.1083/jcb.141.2.515 · DOI
  32. 10.1083/jcb.141.5.1147 · DOI
  33. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1136(199601)16:1<81::AID-GLIA9>3.3.CO;2-L · DOI
  34. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1136(199708)20:4<284::AID-GLIA2>3.0.CO;2-6 · DOI
  35. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4547(19960815)45:4<392::AID-JNR8>3.0.CO;2-4 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/0304-3940(95)11683-N · DOI
  37. 10.1046/j.1365-2443.2000.00333.x · DOI
  38. 10.1073/pnas.94.10.5296 · DOI
  39. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4547(19990101)55:1<17::AID-JNR3>3.0.CO;2-J · DOI
  40. 10.1073/pnas.95.18.10896 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1038/42491 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/0166-2236(81)90060-6 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/S0301-0082(98)00035-5 · DOI
  44. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19971222)389:3<390::AID-CNE3>3.3.CO;2-H · DOI
  45. 10.1002/1097-4547(20010101)63:1<90::AID-JNR11>3.0.CO;2-9 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 34

Metadata

Authors
Rezaie, P., & Male, D.
Venue
Neuroembryology and Aging
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2001-12-07
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
29-43
ISSN
  • 1661-3406
  • 1661-3414
Cited by
34
References
9
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review