Cited by 133

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sensory Systems in Amphioxus: A Window on the Ancestral Chordate Condition

Lacalli, Thurston C.·2004·Brain, Behavior and Evolution

Abstract

Amphioxus has an assortment of cells and organs for sensing light and mechanical stimuli. Vertebrate counterparts of these structures are not always apparent, and a strong case can be made for homology in only a few instances. For example, amphioxus has anatomically simple but plausible homologs of both the pineal and paired eyes of vertebrates. Placodal and neural crest derivatives are, however, more problematic: the evidence for an olfactory system in amphioxus is only circumstantial and, despite the variety of secondary sensory cell types that occur on the body surface in amphioxus, none are obvious homologs of vertebrate taste buds, neuromasts or acoustic hair cells. A useful perspective can nevertheless be gained by examining differences in amphioxus and vertebrate development, specifically how each specifies and positions sensory precursors, controls their proliferation, and deploys them through the body. The much larger size of vertebrate embryos and the need to cope developmentally with increased scale and cell numbers may account for some key vertebrate innovations, including placodes and neural crest. The presence or absence of specific structural adaptations, like the latter, is therefore less useful for judging homology between amphioxus and vertebrates than shared features of specific cell types. It is also clear that the duration of embryogenesis in vertebrates has been significantly extended in comparison with ancestral chordates so as to incorporate events that would originally have occurred during the post-embryonic growth period, including events of neurogenesis. Consequently, no scenario for the origin of vertebrates can be considered complete unless it deals explicitly with the whole of the life history and changes to it.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000079744

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. 10.1016/S0925-4773(97)00129-9 · DOI
  2. 10.1046/j.1525-142X.2002.02021.x · DOI
  3. 10.1046/j.1463-6395.1999.00027.x · DOI
  4. 10.1016/S0959-4388(99)00003-3 · DOI
  5. 10.1046/j.1463-6395.2002.00120.x · DOI
  6. 10.1002/cne.1039 · DOI
  7. 10.1002/jmor.1101 · DOI
  8. 10.1046/j.1463-6395.2002.00109.x · DOI
  9. 10.1046/j.1463-6395.2000.00036.x · DOI
  10. 10.1002/jmor.10114 · DOI
  11. 10.1046/j.1463-6395.2003.00065.x · DOI
  12. 10.1098/rspb.1999.0801 · DOI
  13. 10.1159/000068878 · DOI
  14. 10.1139/cjz-78-9-1626 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2003.09.006 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/S0361-9230(01)00668-2 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/cne.1038 · DOI
  18. 10.1086/413055 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1098/rspb.1998.0385 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00829-2 · DOI
  21. 10.1002/jez.1134 · DOI
  22. 10.1046/j.1463-6395.2002.00097.x · DOI
  23. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19980420)393:4<415::AID-CNE2>3.3.CO;2-M · DOI
  24. 10.1002/dvdy.10173 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lacalli, T. C.
Venue
Brain, Behavior and Evolution
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2004
Volume
64
Issue
3
Pages
148-162
ISSN
  • 0006-8977
  • 1421-9743
Cited by
133
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review