The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Age and Gender Dependent Profile of Food Choice
Abstract
Several studies have described remarkable differences in food choice between men and women. Consistently, women are reported to have higher intakes of fruit and vegetables, higher intakes of dietary fiber and lower intakes of fat. In accordance with such more healthy food choice, women usually attach greater importance to healthy eating. In addition, the motivation of weight control is more prominent in women and they are more likely to diet or restrain their eating behavior. Recently, studies found that health beliefs and weight control motivation may explain up to 50 percent of gender differences in food choice. In addition, less healthy food choice profiles of men may be related to their poorer nutritional knowledge. However, health beliefs, eating attitudes and dieting appear to be phenomena which vary throughout the life span. In growing older, changes in the chemosensory perceptual systems play an important role in food choice. The decline of gustatory and--perhaps even more pronounced--in olfactory function may lead to a decrease of the pleasantness of food, thus limiting the reinforcing properties of food intake which eventually results in a decrease of appetite, often reported in elderly people. In addition, there are some indications that sensory-specific satiety diminishes with age. Sensory-specific satiety is the reduction in the pleasantness of food as it is consumed. This decrease of pleasantness usually motivates the choice of other foods and therefore, a varied diet. Therefore, the decrease of sensory-specific satiety may in part explain the limited variety of the diet sometimes seen in elderly people. However, lifestyle, socio-economic situation and other variables may limit the influence of such physiological changes and help to maintain an adequate food intake despite these age-related processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger
Stunkard, A. J., & Messick, S. (1985) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3999(85)90010-8 · Cited by 4,687
Cited by
Sex differences in the physiology of eating
Asarian, L., & Geary, N. (2013) · American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00446.2012 · Cited by 513
Sex- and gender-specific disparities in colorectal cancer risk
Kim, S.-E. (2015) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v21.i17.5167 · Cited by 493
Assessing gender differences in food preferences and physical activity: a population-based survey
Feraco, A., Armani, A., Amoah, I., Guseva, E., Camajani, E., Gorini, S., Strollo, R., Padua, E., Caprio, M., & Lombardo, M. (2024) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2024.1348456 · Cited by 259
Protein Considerations for Optimising Skeletal Muscle Mass in Healthy Young and Older Adults
Witard, O., Wardle, S., Macnaughton, L., Hodgson, A., & Tipton, K. (2016) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu8040181 · Cited by 132
Holmbäck, I., Ericson, U., Gullberg, B., & Wirfält, E. (2010) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114510001753 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Westenhoefer, J.
- Venue
- Forum of Nutrition
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2005
- Issue
- 57
- Pages
- 44-51
- ISSN
- 0067-8198 (ISSN-L)
- 1660-0347
- 1662-2987
- OpenAlex
- W1505726125
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 29.80
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Age and Gender Dependent Profile of Food Choice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000083753
- The paper
- Westenhoefer, J. (2005). Age and Gender Dependent Profile of Food Choice. Forum of Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1159/000083753
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.