The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Independent Risk Factors for Gallstone Formation in a Region with High Cholelithiasis Prevalence
Abstract
Background/Aims:Cholelithiasis is a common disorder in north-eastern Germany. Analyses of risk factors for gallstone formation in this population may have high explanatory power. Gender-specific risk factors for gallstone formation and their interactions were investigated by using data of the population-based Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP). Methods:Data of 4,202 persons aged 20–79 years were available. Cholelithiasis was defined by either a prior history of cholecystectomy or the presence of gallstones on abdominal ultrasound. Multivariable analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors for gallstone formation. Results:There were 468 persons (11.1%) with previous cholecystectomy and 423 persons (10.1%) with sonographic evidence of gallstones. Women had a twofold higher risk for cholelithiasis compared to men. Age, body mass index and low serum HDL cholesterol levels were independently associated with cholelithiasis in both men and women. In the male population, low alcohol and high coffee consumption and in the female population, low physical activity, were further independently related to gallstone formation. Additionally, sex-specific interactions between risk factors were found. Conclusions: Female sex, age and being overweight are major risk factors for gallstone formation in this region where cholelithiasis is a frequent disorder. Additional factors and interactions contribute to a gender-specific gallstone risk.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Both obesity and abdominal obesity increase the risk not only of stone formation but also of requiring surgical treatment (cholecystectomy) because of the higher likelihood of presenting with symptomatic stones [10,12,13].”
From Excess Body Weight and Gallstone Disease (2021) · cites this paper as [13]
Citations
Cites
Sherbourne, C. D., & Stewart, A. L. (1991) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(91)90150-b · Cited by 6,643
BERKMAN, L. F., & SYME, S. L. (1979) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112674 · Cited by 5,341
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- 10.1002%2F%28SICI%291097-0096%28199901%2927%3A1%3C1%3A%3AAID-JCU1%3E3.0.CO%3B2-H · DOI
- 10.1046%2Fj.1440-1746.2001.02484.x · DOI
- 10.1080%2F00365529850172601 · DOI
- 10.1023%2FA%3A1005643014395 · DOI
- 10.1007%2FBF01730363 · DOI
- 10.1016%2FS0895-4356%2897%2900198-4 · DOI
- 10.1159%2F000064938 · DOI
- 10.1007%2FPL00002084 · DOI
- 10.1023%2FA%3A1024237927985 · DOI
- 10.1053%2Fgast.2002.37054 · DOI
- 10.1097%2F00042737-199606000-00017 · DOI
- 10.1053%2Fjhep.2002.33336 · DOI
- 10.3109%2F00365528708991963 · DOI
- 10.1097%2F00000658-200206000-00012 · DOI
- 10.1016%2FS0002-9270%2802%2903963-1 · DOI
- 10.1016%2FS0002-9270%2801%2902447-9 · DOI
- 10.3109%2F00365528909089235 · DOI
- 10.1007%2FBF02071404 · DOI
- 10.1007%2FBF00145375 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Stokes, C. S., Gluud, L. L., Casper, M., & Lammert, F. (2014) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2013.11.031 · Cited by 118
Excess Body Weight and Gallstone Disease
Stokes, C. S., & Lammert, F. (2021) · Visceral Medicine · doi:10.1159/000516418 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Völzke, H., Baumeister, S. E., Alte, D., Hoffmann, W., Schwahn, C., Simon, P., John, U., & Lerch, M. M.
- Venue
- Digestion
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2005
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 97-105
- ISSN
- 0012-2823
- 1421-9867
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review