Cited by 187

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Independent Risk Factors for Gallstone Formation in a Region with High Cholelithiasis Prevalence

Völzke, Henry, Baumeister, Sebastian E., Alte, Dietrich, Hoffmann, Wolfgang, Schwahn, Christian, Simon, Peter, John, Ulrich, Lerch, Markus M.·2005·Digestion

Abstract

Background/Aims:Cholelithiasis is a common disorder in north-eastern Germany. Analyses of risk factors for gallstone formation in this population may have high explanatory power. Gender-specific risk factors for gallstone formation and their interactions were investigated by using data of the population-based Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP). Methods:Data of 4,202 persons aged 20–79 years were available. Cholelithiasis was defined by either a prior history of cholecystectomy or the presence of gallstones on abdominal ultrasound. Multivariable analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors for gallstone formation. Results:There were 468 persons (11.1%) with previous cholecystectomy and 423 persons (10.1%) with sonographic evidence of gallstones. Women had a twofold higher risk for cholelithiasis compared to men. Age, body mass index and low serum HDL cholesterol levels were independently associated with cholelithiasis in both men and women. In the male population, low alcohol and high coffee consumption and in the female population, low physical activity, were further independently related to gallstone formation. Additionally, sex-specific interactions between risk factors were found. Conclusions: Female sex, age and being overweight are major risk factors for gallstone formation in this region where cholelithiasis is a frequent disorder. Additional factors and interactions contribute to a gender-specific gallstone risk.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000084525

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. 10.1002%2F%28SICI%291097-0096%28199901%2927%3A1%3C1%3A%3AAID-JCU1%3E3.0.CO%3B2-H · DOI
  2. 10.1046%2Fj.1440-1746.2001.02484.x · DOI
  3. 10.1080%2F00365529850172601 · DOI
  4. 10.1023%2FA%3A1005643014395 · DOI
  5. 10.1007%2FBF01730363 · DOI
  6. 10.1016%2FS0895-4356%2897%2900198-4 · DOI
  7. 10.1159%2F000064938 · DOI
  8. 10.1007%2FPL00002084 · DOI
  9. 10.1023%2FA%3A1024237927985 · DOI
  10. 10.1053%2Fgast.2002.37054 · DOI
  11. 10.1097%2F00042737-199606000-00017 · DOI
  12. 10.1053%2Fjhep.2002.33336 · DOI
  13. 10.3109%2F00365528708991963 · DOI
  14. 10.1097%2F00000658-200206000-00012 · DOI
  15. 10.1016%2FS0002-9270%2802%2903963-1 · DOI
  16. 10.1016%2FS0002-9270%2801%2902447-9 · DOI
  17. 10.3109%2F00365528909089235 · DOI
  18. 10.1007%2FBF02071404 · DOI
  19. 10.1007%2FBF00145375 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 187

Metadata

Authors
Völzke, H., Baumeister, S. E., Alte, D., Hoffmann, W., Schwahn, C., Simon, P., John, U., & Lerch, M. M.
Venue
Digestion
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2005
Volume
71
Issue
2
Pages
97-105
ISSN
  • 0012-2823
  • 1421-9867
Cited by
187
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review