Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 253

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Memantine in Moderate to Severe Alzheimer’s Disease: a Meta-Analysis of Randomised Clinical Trials

Winblad, Bengt, Jones, Roy W., Wirth, Yvonne, Stöffler, Albrecht, Möbius, Hans Jörg·2007·Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders

Abstract

The efficacy of memantine in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has been investigated in multiple randomised, placebo-controlled phase III trials. Recently, the indication label for memantine in Europe was extended to cover patients with moderate to severe AD, i.e. Mini-Mental State Exam total scores below 20. The efficacy data for memantine in this patient subgroup has been summarised by a meta-analysis of 1,826 patients in six trials. Efficacy was assessed using measures of global status (Clinician’s Interview-Based Impression of Change Plus Caregiver Input), cognition (Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale – Cognitive Subscale, or Severe Impairment Battery), function (Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study Activities of Daily Living 19- or 23-item scale), and behaviour (Neuropsychiatric Inventory). Results (without replacement of missing values) showed statistically significant effects for memantine (vs. placebo) in each domain. Memantine was well tolerated, and the overall incidence rates of adverse events were comparable to placebo. This meta-analysis supports memantine’s clinically relevant efficacy in patients with moderate to severe AD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000102568

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Cited by

See all 253

Metadata

Authors
Winblad, B., Jones, R. W., Wirth, Y., Stöffler, A., & Möbius, H. J.
Venue
Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2007
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
20-27
ISSN
  • 1420-8008 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9824
OpenAlex
W1984261359
Cited by
253
References
25
FWCI
3.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Memantine in Moderate to Severe Alzheimer’s Disease: a Meta-Analysis of Randomised Clinical Trials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000102568
The paper
Winblad, B., Jones, R. W., Wirth, Y., Stöffler, A., & Möbius, H. J. (2007). Memantine in Moderate to Severe Alzheimer’s Disease: a Meta-Analysis of Randomised Clinical Trials. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1159/000102568

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.