Mapping Scores Onto Stages: Mini-Mental State Examination and Clinical Dementia Rating
Abstract
Objective Although the clinical course of Alzheimer disease (AD) is gradual, it is useful for a number of reasons to distinguish between different levels of severity. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) has demonstrated high validity and reliability for this purpose, but it requires a considerable amount of data to be collected both from the patient and from an informant. In the present study, the authors mapped Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores onto CDR categories to determine how well the MMSE performs as a surrogate of the CDR as a timesaving method of staging dementia.Method Eight hundred sixty-three probands, including 524 patients with probable AD, 92 patients with questionable dementia, and 247 with memory complaints but no objective cognitive impairment, were included. Cutoff scores were identified on one-half of the sample using a receiver operating characteristic analysis. The cutoff values were then applied to the other half of the sample, and the agreement between MMSE score ranges and CDR stages was determined by calculating Cohen's kappa.Results The MMSE discriminated well between CDR stages 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 but performed poorly in the separation between CDR stages zero and 0.5. The MMSE ranges were 30 for no, 26-29 for questionable, 21-25 for mild, 11-20 for moderate, and 0-10 for severe dementia. Substantial agreement between the two instruments was obtained for the categories mild (kappa=0.62, p<0.001, N=115), moderate (kappa=0.69, p<0.001, N=114), and severe dementia (kappa=0.76, p<0.001, N=39), whereas the agreement was moderate for no (kappa=0.44, p<0.001, N=120) and only fair for questionable dementia (kappa=0.28, p<0.001, N=42).Conclusion The MMSE can be used as a surrogate measure for the CDR for the staging of dementia in AD.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies have shown a strong correspondence between CDR scores and MMSE.
“Previous studies have shown a strong correspondence between CDR scores and MMSE (39), and therefore, MMSE would serve as a similar measure of dementia severity.”
From Molecular subtyping of Alzheimer’s disease using RNA sequencing data reveals novel mechanisms and targets (2021) · cites this paper as [39]
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282 · see citing works
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148 · see citing works
McKhann, G., Drachman, D., Folstein, M., Katzman, R., Price, D., & Stadlan, E. M. (1984) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.34.7.939 · Cited by 27,915 · see citing works
- STATISTICAL PACKAGE FOR SOCIAL SCIENCES
Reddy, M. V. (2014) · Apple Academic Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/b17560-26 · Cited by 12,121 · see citing works
The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): Current version and scoring rules
Morris, J. C. (1993) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.43.11.2412-a · Cited by 9,882 · see citing works
A New Clinical Scale for the Staging of Dementia
Hughes, C. P., Berg, L., Danziger, W., Coben, L. A., & Martin, R. L. (1982) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.140.6.566 · Cited by 7,056 · see citing works
The Mini‐Mental State Examination: A Comprehensive Review
Tombaugh, T. N., & McIntyre, N. J. (1992) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1992.tb01992.x · Cited by 5,152 · see citing works
Moms, J. C., Heyman, A., Mohs, R. C., Hughes, J. P., van Belle, G., Fillenbaum, G., Mellits, E. D., & Clark, C. (1989) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.39.9.1159 · Cited by 4,130 · see citing works
Gauthier, S. G., Reisberg, ., Zaudig, M., Petersen, R. C., Ritchie, K. A., Broich, K., Belleville, S., Brodaty, H., Bennett, D. A., Chertkow, H. M., et al. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68542-5 · Cited by 3,920 · see citing works
SPSS: statistical package for the social sciences
Nie, N. H. (1975) · Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) · Cited by 3,461 · see citing works
Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD)
Fillenbaum, G., & Heyman, A. (2002) · doi:10.1002/0470846410.ch42(iii · Cited by 2,859 · see citing works
Practice parameter: Management of dementia (an evidence-based review) [RETIRED]
Doody, R. S., Stevens, J. E., Beck, C., Dubinsky, R., Kaye, J. A., Gwyther, L. P., Mohs, R. C., Thal, L. J., Whitehouse, P. J., DeKosky, S. T., et al. (2001) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.56.9.1154 · Cited by 1,703 · see citing works
Morris, J. C., Mohs, R. C., Rogers, H., Fillenbaum, G. G., & Heyman, A. (1988) · PubMed · Cited by 1,131 · see citing works
Practice parameter: Management of dementia (an evidence-based review)
Oken, B. (2001) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.57.12.2323 · Cited by 578 · see citing works
SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences)
Plume, M. L. (2003) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b0-12-227240-4/00166-0 · Cited by 521 · see citing works
Developmental follow-up : concepts, domains, and methods
Friedman, S. L., & Haywood, H. C. (1994) · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Brief Screening Tests versus Clinical Staging in Senile Dementia of the Alzheimer Type
Davis, P. B., Morris, J. C., & Grant, E. (1990) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1990.tb03473.x · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Juva, K., Sulkava, R., Erkinjuntti, T., Ylikoski, R., Valvanne, J., & Tilvis, R. (1994) · Acta Neurologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0404.1994.tb02724.x · Cited by 87 · see citing works
The Stages of Alzheimer’s Disease: A Reappraisal
KRAEMER, H. C., Taylor, J. L., Tinklenberg, J. R., & Yesavage, J. A. (1998) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders · doi:10.1159/000017081 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Bennett, D. A. (2004) · Clinics in Geriatric Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.cger.2003.10.001 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Perneczky, R. (2003) · Aktuelle Neurologie · doi:10.1055/s-2003-38269 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationDevelopmental Theory, Prediction, and the Developmental Equation in Follow-up Research
Horowitz, F. (1994) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-267855-4.50006-4 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Ousset, P., Andrieu, S., Reynish, E. L., et al. (2003) · La Revue de Médecine Interne · doi:10.1016/s0248-8663(03)80684-7 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vermunt, L., Sikkes, S. A. M., van den Hout, A., Handels, R., Bos, I., van der Flier, W. M., Kern, S., Ousset, P., Maruff, P., Skoog, I., et al. (2019) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2019.04.001 · Cited by 570 · see citing works
Deficiency in neuronal TGF-β signaling promotes neurodegeneration and Alzheimer’s pathology
Tesseur, I., Zou, K., Esposito, L., Bard, F., Berber, E., Can, J. V., Lin, A. H., Crews, L., Tremblay, P., Mathews, P., et al. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci27341 · Cited by 355 · see citing works
Black, B. S., Johnston, D., Rabins, P. V., Morrison, A., Lyketsos, C., & Samus, Q. M. (2013) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.12549 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
“Dementia severity was based on Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)(23) scores of >20 for mild, 11 to 20 for moderate, and <11 for severe.(32) Primary participant demographic and socioeconomic data included age, sex, race, education, living arrangement, and income.”
MethodNeff, R. A., Wang, M., Vatansever, S., Guo, L., Ming, C., Wang, Q., Wang, E., Horgusluoglu-Moloch, E., Song, W.-M., Li, A., et al. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abb5398 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
“Clinical and pathologic phenotypes, as well as demographic information, were also collected as well for each sample including MMSE scores (at time of diagnosis and last known), CERAD score, Braak score, cognitive score, APOE genotype, age of death, age at diagnosis, PMI, gender, race, education level, and if the parti…”
ResultInfluentialProteome profiling in cerebrospinal fluid reveals novel biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease
Bader, J. M., Geyer, P. E., Müller, J. B., Strauss, M. T., Koch, M., Leypoldt, F., Koertvelyessy, P., Bittner, D., Schipke, C. G., Incesoy, E. I., et al. (2020) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.15252/msb.20199356 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Saji, N., Niida, S., Murotani, K., Hisada, T., Tsuduki, T., Sugimoto, T., Kimura, A., Toba, K., & Sakurai, T. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-38218-7 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Black, B. S., Johnston, D., Leoutsakos, J., Reuland, M., Kelly, J., Amjad, H., Davis, K., Willink, A., Sloan, D., Lyketsos, C., et al. (2019) · International Psychogeriatrics · doi:10.1017/s1041610218002296 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Perneczky, R. (2006) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.2006.094714 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Self-citationde Souto Barreto, P., Demougeot, L., Vellas, B., & Rolland, Y. (2018) · The Journals of Gerontology: Series A · doi:10.1093/gerona/glx234 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Severity of Alzheimer’s disease and language features in picture descriptions
Kavé, G., & Dassa, A. (2018) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687038.2017.1303441 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Ferreira, A. R., Dias, C. C., & Fernandes, L. (2016) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2016.00072 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Wiels, W. A., Wittens, M. M. J., Zeeuws, D., Baeken, C., & Engelborghs, S. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.707580 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
A descriptive study of home modifications for people with dementia and barriers to implementation
Marquardt, G., Johnston, D., Black, B. S., Morrison, A., Rosenblatt, A., Lyketsos, C. G., & Samus, Q. M. (2011) · Journal of Housing for the Elderly · doi:10.1080/02763893.2011.595612 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Weycker, D., Taneja, C., Edelsberg, J., Haim Erder, M., Schmitt, F. A., Setyawan, J., & Oster, G. (2007) · Current Medical Research and Opinion · doi:10.1185/030079907x188071 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Han, S.-H., Kim, J. S., Lee, Y., Choi, H., Kim, J.-W., Na, D. L., Yang, E. G., Yu, M.-H., Hwang, D., Lee, C., et al. (2014) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m113.028639 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Lima, A. P. V., Castilhos, R., & Chaves, M. L. F. (2017) · Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders · doi:10.1097/wad.0000000000000205 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Ostertag, C., Visani, M., Urruty, T., & Beurton-Aimar, M. (2023) · International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11548-023-02866-6 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Integrative network analysis reveals novel moderators of Aβ-Tau interaction in Alzheimer's disease
Kitani, A., Matsui, Y., & Initiative, F. T. A. D. N. (2025) · Alzheimer's Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-025-01705-x · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Perneczky, R., Wagenpfeil, S., Komossa, K., Grimmer, T., Diehl, J., & Kurz, A.
- Affiliations
- Technical University of Munich (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Perneczky, Robert
- Venue
- The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-02
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 139-144
- ISSN
- 1064-7481 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2075819229
- Cited by
- 768
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 51 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 98 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 10.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, dementia staging, Mini-Mental State Examination, Clinical Dementia Rating, cut-off values, surrogate measures, informant assessment, cognitive impairment severity, interobserver agreement
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Severity of Illness Index
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review