Cited by 768Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchPsychological Testing and AssessmentHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

Mapping Scores Onto Stages: Mini-Mental State Examination and Clinical Dementia Rating

Perneczky, Robert, Wagenpfeil, Stefan, Komossa, Katja, Grimmer, Timo, Diehl, Janine, Kurz, Alexander·2006·The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective Although the clinical course of Alzheimer disease (AD) is gradual, it is useful for a number of reasons to distinguish between different levels of severity. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) has demonstrated high validity and reliability for this purpose, but it requires a considerable amount of data to be collected both from the patient and from an informant. In the present study, the authors mapped Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores onto CDR categories to determine how well the MMSE performs as a surrogate of the CDR as a timesaving method of staging dementia.Method Eight hundred sixty-three probands, including 524 patients with probable AD, 92 patients with questionable dementia, and 247 with memory complaints but no objective cognitive impairment, were included. Cutoff scores were identified on one-half of the sample using a receiver operating characteristic analysis. The cutoff values were then applied to the other half of the sample, and the agreement between MMSE score ranges and CDR stages was determined by calculating Cohen's kappa.Results The MMSE discriminated well between CDR stages 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 but performed poorly in the separation between CDR stages zero and 0.5. The MMSE ranges were 30 for no, 26-29 for questionable, 21-25 for mild, 11-20 for moderate, and 0-10 for severe dementia. Substantial agreement between the two instruments was obtained for the categories mild (kappa=0.62, p<0.001, N=115), moderate (kappa=0.69, p<0.001, N=114), and severe dementia (kappa=0.76, p<0.001, N=39), whereas the agreement was moderate for no (kappa=0.44, p<0.001, N=120) and only fair for questionable dementia (kappa=0.28, p<0.001, N=42).Conclusion The MMSE can be used as a surrogate measure for the CDR for the staging of dementia in AD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.jgp.0000192478.82189.a8

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perneczky, R., Wagenpfeil, S., Komossa, K., Grimmer, T., Diehl, J., & Kurz, A.
Affiliations
Technical University of Munich (DE)
Corresponding author
Perneczky, Robert
Venue
The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-02
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
139-144
ISSN
1064-7481 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075819229
Cited by
768
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 98 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 9
FWCI
10.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, dementia staging, Mini-Mental State Examination, Clinical Dementia Rating, cut-off values, surrogate measures, informant assessment, cognitive impairment severity, interobserver agreement
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Severity of Illness Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review