Cited by 1,155Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases

Memantine for dementia

Open access
McShane, Rupert, Areosa Sastre, Almudena, Minakaran, Neda·2006·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

Background Memantine, a low affinity antagonist to glutamate NMDA receptors, may prevent excitatory neurotoxicity in dementia. Objectives To determine efficacy and safety of memantine for people with Alzheimer's disease (AD), vascular (VD) and mixed dementia. Search strategy The Specialized Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group was searched on 8th February 2006. This register contains references from all major healthcare databases and many ongoing trial databases and is updated regularly. In addition, the search engines Copernic and Google were used to identify unpublished trials through inspection of the websites of licensing bodies like the FDA , EMEA and NICE and of companies' websites (Lundbeck, Merz, Forest, Suntori etc) and clinical trials registries. Selection criteria Double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled, randomized trials of memantine in people with dementia. Data collection and analysis Data were pooled where possible. Intention-to-treat (ITT) and observed case (OC) analyses are reported. Main results 1. Moderate to severe AD. Two out of three six month studies show a small beneficial effect of memantine. Pooled data indicate a beneficial effect at six months on cognition (2.97 points on the 100 point SIB, 95% CI 1.68 to 4.26, P Authors' conclusions Memantine has a small beneficial effect at six months in moderate to severe AD. In patients with mild to moderate dementia, the small beneficial effect on cognition was not clinica…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd003154.pub5

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Trials of cytidinediphosphocholine, nimodipine, piracetam, huperzine A, and vinpocetine have not produced convincing data.

    “Trials have been conducted with other compounds, including cytidinediphosphocholine,412,413 nimodipine,414 piracetam,415 huperzine A,416 and vinpocetine,417 but so far without convincing data”
  • Although data from RCTs of memantine in patients with moderate to severe dementia had indicated that it might also confer benefit, a recent trial specifically examining the efficacy of this agent for Alzheimer's dementia with agitation found no benefit over placebo.

    “Although data from RCTs of memantine in patients with moderate to severe dementia had indicated that it might also confer benefit,151 152 153 a recent trial specifically examining the efficacy of this agent for Alzheimer’s dementia with agitation found no benefit over placebo.154”
  • Cholinesterase inhibitors are associated with diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting, and less commonly with symptomatic bradycardia and syncope.

    “Cholinesterase inhibitors are associated with diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting, and less commonly with symptomatic bradycardia and syncope.153 155”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McShane, R., Areosa Sastre, A., & Minakaran, N.
Affiliations
  • John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
  • c/ Mauricio Legendre 17, 5-A Madrid Spain 28046
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-04-19
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
CD003154-CD003154
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W1962254068
Cited by
1,155
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 67 · 2013: 64 · 2012: 57
FWCI
9.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
Keywords
memantine, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, NMDA receptor antagonists, cholinesterase inhibitors, combination therapy, cognitive function, activities of daily living, functional status, agitation, off-label drug use, drug safety, adverse events, mild Alzheimer's disease, publication bias, risk of bias assessment
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Cognition Disorders, Dementia, Humans, Memantine, Dementia, Vascular, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review