The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Role of Higher-Level Cognitive Function in Gait: Executive Dysfunction Contributes to Fall Risk in Alzheimer’s Disease
Open accessAbstract
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is generally understood as primarily affecting cognition while sparing motor function, at least until the later stages of the disease. Studies reported over the past 10 years, however, have documented a prevalence of falls in AD patients significantly higher than in age-matched normal elders; also persons with AD have been observed to have different walking patterns with characteristics that increase gait instability. Recent work in cognitive neuroscience has begun to demonstrate the necessity of intact cognition, particularly executive function, for competent motor control. We put the pieces of this puzzle together and review the current state of knowledge about gait and cognition in general along with an exploration of the association between dementia, gait impairment and falls in AD. We also briefly examine the current treatment of gait instability in AD, mainly exercise, and propose a new approach targeting cognition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure
Shallice, T. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511526817 · Cited by 4,072
Cross-modal plasticity: where and how?
Bavelier, D., & Neville, H. J. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn848 · Cited by 1,040
Anatomy of motor learning. I. Frontal cortex and attention to action
Jueptner, M., Stephan, K. M., Frith, C. D., Brooks, D. J., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Passingham, R. E. (1997) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1997.77.3.1313 · Cited by 624
Shaw, F. E., Bond, J., Richardson, D. A., Dawson, P., Steen, I. N., McKeith, I. G., & Kenny, R. A. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7380.73 · Cited by 414
Diagnostic Criteria for Neuropathologic Assessment of Alzheimer’s Disease
Braak, H., & Braak, E. (1997) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/s0197-4580(97)00062-6 · Cited by 410
HULETTE, C. M., WELSH-BOHMER, K. A., MURRAY, M. G., SAUNDERS, A. M., MASH, D. C., & MCINTYRE, L. M. (1998) · Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1097/00005072-199812000-00009 · Cited by 311
Pohjasvaara, T., Mäntylä, R., Ylikoski, R., Kaste, M., & Erkinjuntti, T. (2000) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.31.12.2952 · Cited by 238 · cited 1×
“even though the diagnostic criteria are varied and not necessarily interchangeable [”
BackgroundDeterminants of vascular dementia in the Cardiovascular Health Cognition Study
Kuller, L. H., Lopez, O. L., Jagust, W. J., Becker, J. T., DeKosky, S. T., Lyketsos, C., Kawas, C., Breitner, J. C. S., Fitzpatrick, A., & Dulberg, C. (2005) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000160115.55756.de · Cited by 179 · cited 1×
“] even though the diagnostic criteria are varied and not necessarily interchangeable [ ,”
Background
Cited by
A claims data-based comparison of comorbidity in individuals with and without dementia
Bauer, K., Schwarzkopf, L., Graessel, E., & Holle, R. (2014) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/1471-2318-14-10 · Cited by 157
Öhman, H., Savikko, N., Strandberg, T., Kautiainen, H., Raivio, M., Laakkonen, M.-L., Tilvis, R., & Pitkälä, K. H. (2016) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders · doi:10.1159/000445712 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Sheridan, P. L., & Hausdorff, J. M.
- Venue
- Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 125-137
- ISSN
- 1420-8008 (ISSN-L)
- 1421-9824
- OpenAlex
- W1974877093
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 37.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
