Cited by 49Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionPhysical Activity and Health

Effects of Exercise on Functional Performance and Fall Rate in Subjects with Mild or Advanced Alzheimer’s Disease: Secondary Analyses of a Randomized Controlled Study

Öhman, Hannareeta, Savikko, Niina, Strandberg, Timo, Kautiainen, Hannu, Raivio, Minna, Laakkonen, Marja-Liisa, Tilvis, Reijo, Pitkälä, Kaisu H.·2016·Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Exercise improves functional performance in subjects with dementia. However, whether the benefits of exercise are evident in all stages of dementia remains uncertain. This study examines how people in different stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD) benefit from exercise intervention in their physical functioning and risk of falling. METHODS: The present study is a subanalysis of a randomized controlled trial examining the effects of exercise intervention (twice a week for 12 months) in AD patients (n = 194). We studied the effects separately in participants with mild dementia and in participants with advanced dementia. RESULTS: In subjects with mild dementia, the deterioration in physical functioning was slower in the intervention group than in the controls. Changes in Functional Independence Measure at 12 months were -2.7 (95% CI -0.5 to -4.9) in the intervention group and -10.1 (95% CI -7.0 to -13.3) in the control group (p < 0.001). The exercise intervention proved effective in preventing falls among patients with advanced AD, with an incidence rate ratio of 0.47 (95% CI 0.37-0.60; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Regular exercise may slow the rate of functional deterioration in mild AD and reduce falls in patients suffering from advanced AD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000445712

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Physical exercises improve cognition and quality of life, and home-based exercises improve balance and fear of falling and executive functions.

    “Physical exercises are reported to improve cognition and quality of life, and home-based exercises seemed to improve balance and fear of falling and executive functions [190,191,192].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Öhman, H., Savikko, N., Strandberg, T., Kautiainen, H., Raivio, M., Laakkonen, M.-L., Tilvis, R., & Pitkälä, K. H.
Affiliations
University of Helsinki (FI)
Venue
Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2016
Volume
41
Issue
3-4
Pages
233-241
ISSN
  • 1420-8008 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9824
OpenAlex
W2345581789
Cited by
49
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
FWCI
4.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
exercise intervention, Alzheimer's disease, mild dementia, advanced dementia, functional performance, physical function, fall risk, fall prevention, Functional Independence Measure, functional decline, dementia stages
MeSH terms
Accidental Falls, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Dementia, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Research Design, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review