Results of Varicocelectomy in Patients with Isolated Teratozoospermia
Abstract
Introduction: Isolated teratozoospermia is rarely encountered in patients with clinically palpable varicocele, and the consequences of varicocelectomy remain unclear in these cases. In the current study, we assessed the effect of varicocelectomy on sperm morphology in a series of patients with infertility. Materials and Methods: The data obtained from 52 primary subfertile men with isolated teratozoospermia and clinical palpable varicocele were reviewed retrospectively. Varicocelectomy was performed on 29 patients, and the remaining 23 patients did not undergo any treatment (control group). The differences in sperm morphology assessed by using Kruger’s strict criteria 3 months before and 12 months after varicocelectomy were taken into consideration for statistical analysis. Results: One patient who underwent varicocelectomy was excluded from the study due to varicocele recurrence. Thus, data obtained from the remaining 28 patients were evaluated. Following varicocelectomy, significant improvement was detected in the ratio of normal sperm forms (p < 0.001). While there was significant improvement in the ratio of sperm cells with head defects, tail defects and immature forms (p < 0.001), the ratio of sperm with acrosome and mid-piece defects was not changed (p > 0.05). While an overall spontaneous pregnancy was achieved in 5 of the 28 (17.8%) couples in the varicocelectomy group within 12 months after operation, neither improvement in sperm morphology nor pregnancy in the patients’ partners was detected in the control group. Conclusion: Varicocelectomy caused a significant improvement in sperm morphology, particularly in immature forms and forms with head and tail defects evaluated by Kruger’s classification.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several studies have evaluated the role of varicocelectomy and antioxidants in improving sperm morphology, particularly for immature sperm and those with head and tail defects based on Kruger's classification.
“Several studies have evaluated the role of varicocelectomy and antioxidants in improving sperm morphology, particularly for immature sperm and those with head and tail defects based on Kruger’s classification (97-104).”
From Isolated teratozoospermia: revisiting its relevance in male infertility: a narrative review (2024) · cites this paper as [98]
Around one-sixth to one-third of subjects with isolated teratozoospermia achieve spontaneous pregnancy after varicocelectomy.
“Studies also found that around one-sixth to one-third of subjects with isolated teratozoospermia achieve spontaneous pregnancy after varicocelectomy (98,99).”
From Isolated teratozoospermia: revisiting its relevance in male infertility: a narrative review (2024) · cites this paper as [98]
Cites
The evaluation of morphological characteristics of human spermatozoa according to stricter criteria
Menkveld, R., Stander, F. S. H., Kotze, T. J. V., Kruger, T. F., & Zyl, J. A. V. (1990) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137150 · Cited by 677 · see citing works
Isolated teratozoospermia and intrauterine insemination
Spiessens, C., Vanderschueren, D., Meuleman, C., & D'Hooghe, T. (2003) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(03)01172-5 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Isolated teratozoospermia: revisiting its relevance in male infertility: a narrative review
Atmoko, W., Savira, M., Shah, R., Chung, E., & Agarwal, A. (2024) · Translational Andrology and Urology · doi:10.21037/tau-23-397 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
“Studies also found that around one-sixth to one-third of subjects with isolated teratozoospermia achieve spontaneous pregnancy after varicocelectomy (98,99).”
Is Varicocelectomy Useful for Subfertile Men with Isolated Teratozoospermia?
Choe, J. H., & Seo, J. T. (2015) · Urology · doi:10.1016/j.urology.2015.08.014 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Çakan, M., Bakirtas, H., Aldemir, M., Demirel, F., & Altug, U.
- Venue
- Urologia Internationalis
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 172-176
- ISSN
- 0042-1138 (ISSN-L)
- 1423-0399
- OpenAlex
- W2048920724
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Urologia Internationalis (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Male Reproductive Health Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Keywords
- varicocelectomy, varicocele, male infertility, sperm morphology, sperm head abnormalities, sperm tail defects, spontaneous conception, varicocele recurrence
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Humans, Infertility, Male, Male, Spermatozoa, Varicocele, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review