Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 307

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Neuronal Interconnection as a Function of Brain Size

Ringo, James L.·2008·Brain, Behavior and Evolution

Abstract

The effect of increasing brain size upon the degree of interconnection between neurons is analyzed. An explicit model suggests that as the brain is scaled up there must be a corresponding fall in percent connectedness (the fraction of cells with which any one cell communicates directly). The reason for this is that if the percent connectedness is to be maintained in the face of increased neuron number, then a large fraction of any brain size increase would be spent maintaining such interconnection while the increasing axon lengths would reduce neural computational speed. One implication is that larger brains, being necessarily limited in allowable interconnectedness, may tend to show more specialization.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000114375

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 307

Metadata

Authors
Ringo, J. L.
Venue
Brain, Behavior and Evolution
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2008-01-30
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
1-6
ISSN
  • 0006-8977 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9743
OpenAlex
W2044657643
Cited by
307
References
0
FWCI
5.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neuronal Interconnection as a Function of Brain Size. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000114375
The paper
Ringo, J. L. (2008). Neuronal Interconnection as a Function of Brain Size. Brain, Behavior and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1159/000114375

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.