The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Mayo Clinic Study of Aging: Design and Sampling, Participation, Baseline Measures and Sample Characteristics
Open accessAbstract
Background: The objective of this study was to establish a prospective population-based cohort to investigate the prevalence, incidence and risk factors for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. Methods: The Olmsted County, Minn., population, aged 70–89 years on October 1, 2004, was enumerated using the Rochester Epidemiology Project. Eligible subjects were randomly selected and invited to participate. Participants underwent a comprehensive in-person evaluation including the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale, a neurological evaluation and neuropsychological testing. A consensus diagnosis of normal cognition, MCI or dementia was made by a panel using previously published criteria. A subsample of subjects was studied via telephone interview. Results: Four hundred and two subjects with dementia were identified from a detailed review of their medical records but were not contacted. At baseline, we successfully evaluated 703 women aged 70–79 years, 769 women aged 80–89 years, 730 men aged 70–79 years and 517 men aged 80–89 years (total n = 2,719). Among the participants, 2,050 subjects were evaluated in person and 669 via telephone. Conclusions: Strengths of the study are that the subjects were randomly selected from a defined population, the majority of the subjects were examined in person, and MCI was defined using published criteria. Here, we report the design and sampling, participation, baseline measures and sample characteristics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): Current version and scoring rules
Morris, J. C. (1993) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.43.11.2412-a · Cited by 9,882
The Cardiovascular Health Study: design and rationale.
Fried, L. P., Borhani, N. O., Enright, P., Furberg, C. D., Gardin, J. M., Kronmal, R. A., Kuller, L. H., Manolio, T. A., Mittelmark, M. B., Newman, A., et al. (1991) · Annals of Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/1047-2797(91)90005-w · Cited by 3,652
History of the Rochester Epidemiology Project
Melton, L. J. (1996) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.4065/71.3.266 · Cited by 1,443
Cesari, M., Kritchevsky, S. B., Penninx, B. W. H. J., Nicklas, B. J., Simonsick, E. M., Newman, A. B., Tylavsky, F. A., Brach, J. S., Satterfield, S., Bauer, D. C., et al. (2005) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53501.x · Cited by 1,192
Conversion from subtypes of mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer dementia
Fischer, P., Jungwirth, S., Zehetmayer, S., Weissgram, S., Hoenigschnabl, S., Gelpi, E., Krampla, W., & Tragl, K. H. (2007) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000252358.03285.9d · Cited by 471
Prevalence of Dementia in Older Japanese-American Men in Hawaii: The Honolulu-Asia Aging Study
White, L. (1996) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03540120033030 · Cited by 437
Mayo's older Americans normative studies: updated AVLT norms for ages 56 to 97
Ivnik, R. J., Malec, J. F., Smith, G. E., Tangalos, E. G., Petersen, R. C., Kokmen, E., & Kurland, L. T. (1992) · Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1080/13854049208401880 · Cited by 310
Self-citationPlasma homocysteine levels and risk of Alzheimer disease
Luchsinger, J. A., Tang, M. X., Shea, S., Miller, J., Green, R., & Mayeux, R. (2004) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000129504.60409.88 · Cited by 171
Cited by
Revised criteria for diagnosis and staging of Alzheimer's disease: Alzheimer's Association Workgroup
Jack, C. R., Andrews, J. S., Beach, T. G., Buracchio, T., Dunn, B., Graf, A., Hansson, O., Ho, C., Jagust, W., McDade, E., et al. (2024) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.13859 · Cited by 2,803
Mild cognitive impairment: a concept in evolution
Petersen, R. C., Caracciolo, B., Brayne, C., Gauthier, S., Jelic, V., & Fratiglioni, L. (2014) · Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/joim.12190 · Cited by 1,694
Self-citationMild Cognitive Impairment: Ten Years Later
Petersen, R. C., Roberts, R. O., Knopman, D. S., Boeve, B. F., Geda, Y. E., Ivnik, R. J., Smith, G. E., & Jack, C. R. (2009) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneurol.2009.266 · Cited by 1,447
Self-citationCraft, S. (2012) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneurol.2011.233 · Cited by 1,253
Defining imaging biomarker cut points for brain aging and Alzheimer's disease
Jack, C. R., Wiste, H. J., Weigand, S. D., Therneau, T. M., Lowe, V. J., Knopman, D. S., Gunter, J. L., Senjem, M. L., Jones, D. T., Kantarci, K., et al. (2017) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2016.08.005 · Cited by 931
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Roberts, R. O., Geda, Y. E., Knopman, D. S., Cha, R. H., Pankratz, V. S., Boeve, B. F., Ivnik, R. J., Tangalos, E. G., Petersen, R. C., & Rocca, W. A.
- Venue
- Neuroepidemiology
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 58-69
- ISSN
- 0251-5350 (ISSN-L)
- 1423-0208
- OpenAlex
- W2020780341
- Cited by
- 793
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 12.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Mayo Clinic Study of Aging: Design and Sampling, Participation, Baseline Measures and Sample Characteristics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000115751
- The paper
- Roberts, R. O., Geda, Y. E., Knopman, D. S., Cha, R. H., Pankratz, V. S., Boeve, B. F., Ivnik, R. J., Tangalos, E. G., Petersen, R. C., & Rocca, W. A. (2008). The Mayo Clinic Study of Aging: Design and Sampling, Participation, Baseline Measures and Sample Characteristics. Neuroepidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1159/000115751
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
