Cited by 62Motor Control and AdaptationNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFree Will and Agency

Gradual Specification of Response Amplitude in Human Tracking Performance

Ghez, Claude, Hening, Wayne, Favilla, Marco·2008·Brain, Behavior and Evolution

Abstract

These experiments examine how human subjects use information from a target to trigger a response and to specify its trajectory. We first determined if response initiation is predicated on the prior specification of response amplitude by examining the latencies and trajectories of impulses of isometric elbow flexion aimed to one of three visual targets. We varied target predictability (simple versus choice), the urgency with which the response was required, and the level of practice. With practice, subjects could respond to unpredictable targets with the same latency as to predictable ones; the range of response amplitudes was, however, always constricted. This central tendency bias disappeared when subjects were allowed long latencies to respond to the target, suggesting that with urgency, subjects can respond before specification is complete. To determine the time course of specification, the subjects were trained to initiate force impulses in synchrony with the last of a series of predictable tones. They also attempted to match the amplitude of their force impulses to one of three unpredictable visual targets presented at randomly varying times (50–400 ms) prior to the synchronizing tone. At the shortest stimulus-response intervals, before target information could be processed, the amplitudes of responses to all targets were clustered around that of the middle-sized target. Then, as the stimuli-response interval increased, response amplitudes gradually converged upon their specific targets. Specification started at stimulus-response intervals of about 100 ms and extended until about 350 ms. We conclude that (1) subjects prepare an adaptive or default response prior to the occurrence of the target; (2) the specification of response amplitude is a gradual process by which the dimensions of the default are adjusted according to target information, and (3) amplitude specification begins earlier and terminates later than the time needed to initiate the motor response or reaction time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000115902

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is well known that the initiation and final specification of a movement can be dissociated in time.

    “It is well known that the initiation and final specification of a movement can be dissociated in time30.”

    From Changes of mind in decision-making (2009) · cites this paper as [30]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ghez, C., Hening, W., & Favilla, M.
Affiliations
New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
Venue
Brain, Behavior and Evolution
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2008-02-06
Volume
33
Issue
2-3
Pages
69-74
ISSN
  • 0006-8977 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9743
OpenAlex
W2061745656
Cited by
62
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Behavior and Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ns022715-14)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS 22715)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
Keywords
motor preparation, target predictability, isometric elbow flexion, central tendency bias, practice effects, reaction time
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Choice Behavior, Female, Humans, Kinesthesis, Male, Orientation, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review