The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Likelihood-Based Association Analysis for Nuclear Families and Unrelated Subjects with Missing Genotype Data
Open accessAbstract
Missing data occur in genetic association studies for several reasons including missing family members and uncertain haplotype phase. Maximum likelihood is a commonly used approach to accommodate missing data, but it can be difficult to apply to family-based association studies, because of possible loss of robustness to confounding by population stratification. Here a novel likelihood for nuclear families is proposed, in which distinct sets of association parameters are used to model the parental genotypes and the offspring genotypes. This approach is robust to population structure when the data are complete, and has only minor loss of robustness when there are missing data. It also allows a novel conditioning step that gives valid analysis for multiple offspring in the presence of linkage. Unrelated subjects are included by regarding them as the children of two missing parents. Simulations and theory indicate similar operating characteristics to TRANSMIT, but with no bias with missing data in the presence of linkage. In comparison with FBAT and PCPH, the proposed model is slightly less robust to population structure but has greater power to detect strong effects. In comparison to APL and MITDT, the model is more robust to stratification and can accommodate sibships of any size. The methods are implemented for binary and continuous traits in software, UNPHASED, available from the author.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum-likelihood estimation of molecular haplotype frequencies in a diploid population.
(1995) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040269 · Cited by 1,950
Searching for genetic determinants in the new millennium
Risch, N. J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35015718 · Cited by 1,839
A General Test of Association for Quantitative Traits in Nuclear Families
Abecasis, G. R., Cardon, L. R., & Cookson, W. O. C. (2000) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/302698 · Cited by 1,126
Use of unphased multilocus genotype data in indirect association studies
Clayton, D., Chapman, J., & Cooper, J. (2004) · Genetic Epidemiology · doi:10.1002/gepi.20032 · Cited by 186
Cited by
Using genetic data to strengthen causal inference in observational research
Pingault, J.-B., O’Reilly, P. F., Schoeler, T., Ploubidis, G. B., Rijsdijk, F., & Dudbridge, F. (2018) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-018-0020-3 · Cited by 444
Self-citationChakrabarti, B., Dudbridge, F., Kent, L., Wheelwright, S., Hill‐Cawthorne, G., Allison, C., Banerjee‐Basu, S., & Baron‐Cohen, S. (2009) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.80 · Cited by 295
Self-citationA Genome‐wide Association Study of Autism Reveals a Common Novel Risk Locus at 5p14.1
Ma, D., Salyakina, D., Jaworski, J. M., Konidari, I., Whitehead, P. L., Andersen, A. N., Hoffman, J. D., Slifer, S. H., Hedges, D. J., Cukier, H. N., et al. (2009) · Annals of Human Genetics · doi:10.1111/j.1469-1809.2009.00523.x · Cited by 221
Fritsche, L. G., Lauer, N., Hartmann, A., Stippa, S., Keilhauer, C. N., Oppermann, M., Pandey, M. K., Köhl, J., Zipfel, P. F., Weber, B. H. F., et al. (2010) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddq399 · Cited by 203
Association between the oxytocin receptor gene and amygdalar volume in healthy adults
Inoue, H., Yamasue, H., Tochigi, M., Abe, O., Liu, X., Kawamura, Y., Takei, K., Suga, M., Yamada, H., Rogers, M. A., et al. (2010) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.07.019 · Cited by 164
Metadata
- Authors
- Dudbridge, F.
- Venue
- Human Heredity
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 87-98
- ISSN
- 0001-5652 (ISSN-L)
- 1423-0062
- OpenAlex
- W2029220352
- Cited by
- 612
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 42.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.