The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Connections of the Dorsomedial Nuclei
Abstract
The connections of the mediodorsal nucleus were compared in rats, cats and monkeys. The medial portion receives from the olfactory cortex in rats, amygdala in cats, and amygdala and inferior temporal cortex in monkeys. In turn, the medial portion projects to sulcal cortex dorsal to the rhinal fissure in rats, and to orbitofrontal cortex in monkeys. The paralamellar portion of the mediodorsal nucleus receives from the cerebellum, superior colliculus and spinal cord and projects to the medial frontal area in rats and area 8 in monkeys. The lateral portion of the mediodorsal nucleus, well developed in monkeys, receives no known projections from subcortical regions and projects to the convexity of the frontal lobe.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The medial mediodorsal thalamic nucleus then projects to the infralimbic, prelimbic and agranular insular cortices (Leonard, 1972; Groenewegen, 1988; Ray and Price, 1992), which project to the ventral striatum (Berendse et al., 1992a; Brog et al., 1993).”
From Dopamine reward circuitry: Two projection systems from the ventral midbrain to the nucleus accumbens–olfactory tubercle complex (2007) · cites this paper as Leonard, 1972
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ikemoto, S. (2007) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.05.004 · Cited by 1,477
The cortical projections of the mediodorsal nucleus and adjacent thalamic nuclei in the rat
Krettek, J. E., & Price, J. L. (1977) · The Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.901710204 · Cited by 1,277
Heidbreder, C. A., & Groenewegen, H. J. (2003) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2003.09.003 · Cited by 882
Functions of the frontal cortex of the rat: A comparative review
Kolb, B. E. (1984) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/0165-0173(84)90018-3 · Cited by 897
Beckstead, R. M. (1979) · The Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.901840104 · Cited by 792
Metadata
- Authors
- Leonard, C. M.
- Affiliations
- Rockefeller University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Leonard, Christiana M.
- Venue
- Brain Behavior and Evolution
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2008-03-27
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 524-541
- ISSN
- 0006-8977 (ISSN-L)
- 1421-9743
- OpenAlex
- W2039822024
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Brain Behavior and Evolution (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
- Keywords
- mediodorsal nucleus, thalamus, thalamic connections, olfactory cortex, amygdala, inferior temporal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, cerebellum, superior colliculus, comparative neuroanatomy, rats, cats, monkeys
- MeSH terms
- Amygdala, Animals, Haplorhini, Cats, Cerebral Cortex, Frontal Lobe, Macaca, Nerve Degeneration, Neural Pathways, Neurons, Afferent, Olfactory Bulb, Temporal Lobe, Thalamic Nuclei, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review