Cited by 373Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyHuman-Animal Interaction Studies

Intracerebroventricular oxytocin stimulates maternal behaviour in the sheep

Kendrick, Keith M., Keverne, Eric B., Baldwin, Basil A.·2008·Neuroendocrinology

Abstract

The maternal behaviour of 7 ovariectomized, oestrogen-treated ewes was recorded after intracerebroventricular (ICV) infusions of oxytocin (OT). At weekly intervals 10-min behaviour tests were given starting 1 min after control (saline) or OT infusions. In the ewes' home pens, 5-, 10- and 20-micrograms doses of OT significantly increased the frequency of some or all of the maternal behaviours scored (low-pitch bleats, sniffing, licking and approaching/following the lamb), and 3 ewes allowed suckling attempts. Aggressive (head butts) and negative (withdrawal from the lamb) behaviours significantly decreased in frequency. Vaginocervical stimulation (10 min duration) produced similar effects on these behaviours. When the lambs were removed from the ewes' pens, the ewes exhibited significantly more high-pitch bleats (protest) following OT treatment. When 20 micrograms OT was given ICV in the absence of oestrogen priming, or when it was given intravenously with oestrogen priming, no significant effects on maternal behaviour were seen. Maternal behaviour was also significantly stimulated in oestrogen-treated ewes in a larger, novel testing environment (an enclosed area of field) following 5- and 20-micrograms doses of OT. In an additional experiment in the field enclosure it was found that ewes spent significantly more time near a lamb in a cage following both 5- and 20-micrograms doses of OT. In both experimental settings the high OT doses (10 and 20 micrograms) significantly increased the frequency of feeding although the effect was not dependent on oestrogen priming. These results demonstrate that central OT may play an important role in stimulating maternal behaviour in the sheep.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000124796

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 373

Authors
Kendrick, K. M., Keverne, E. B., & Baldwin, B. A.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
Neuroendocrinology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2008-04-02
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
56-61
ISSN
  • 0028-3835 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0194
OpenAlex
W1974381568
Cited by
373
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 9
FWCI
19.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Keywords
oxytocin, maternal behavior, sheep, intracerebroventricular infusion, estrogen priming, ewes, aggression, vaginocervical stimulation, central nervous system
MeSH terms
Animals, Cervix Uteri, Female, Homing Behavior, Injections, Intraventricular, Maternal Behavior, Ovariectomy, Oxytocin, Physical Stimulation, Sheep, Vagina

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review