Cited by 190Stress Responses and CortisolMemory and Neural MechanismsNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Amygdaloid Lesions: Differential Effect on Conditioned Stress and Immobilization-Induced Increases in Corticosterone and Renin Secretion

Van de Kar, L.D., Piechowski, Rashel A., Rittenhouse, Peter A., Gray, Thackery S.·2008·Neuroendocrinology

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the contribution of the central nucleus of the amygdala to the expression of stress-induced increase in corticosterone and renin secretion. Neurons in the central amygdaloid nucleus of male rats were destroyed by bilateral injections of ibotenic acid, a neurotoxin that destroys cells but leaves fibers of passage intact. Two weeks later, the rats were subjected to immobilization for 20 min or to a conditioned stress (conditioned emotional response) procedure. Central amygdala lesions inhibited the increases in plasma corticosterone after exposure to both conditioned stress and immobilization. Lesions in the lateral amygdala had no effect on the corticosterone response to either stressor. Lesions in the central amygdala attenuated the renin response to conditioned stress but not to immobilization. In contrast, lateral amygdala lesions potentiated the renin response to immobilization but did not affect the renin response to conditioned stress. The results confirm previous studies that demonstrate the importance of the central amygdaloid nucleus in the expression of corticosterone to immobilization stress. In addition, the results show that neurons within the central amygdaloid nucleus are necessary for the full expression of conditioned stress-induced increase in corticosterone and renin secretion. The results are discussed with respect to the potential pathways that mediate stress-induced increases in corticosterone and renin secretion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000125856

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van de Kar, L. D., Piechowski, R. A., Rittenhouse, P. A., & Gray, T. S.
Affiliations
Loyola University Chicago (US)
Venue
Neuroendocrinology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2008-04-07
Volume
54
Issue
2
Pages
89-95
ISSN
  • 0028-3835 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0194
OpenAlex
W2088083940
Cited by
190
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
central amygdala, lateral amygdala, corticosterone, renin secretion, restraint stress, conditioned emotional response, ibotenic acid lesions
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Animals, Conditioning, Psychological, Corticosterone, Ibotenic Acid, Male, Rats, Inbred Strains, Renin, Restraint, Physical, Stress, Physiological, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review