The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Superior Endurance Performance in Aging Mountain Runners
Abstract
Background: Oxygen uptake at the anaerobic threshold (VO 2 AT) is considered as the main determinant for endurance performance in humans. Endurance performance steeply decreases with aging but seems to be kept exceedingly high in elite mountain runners. Methods: To obtain the age- and gender-related upper limits of endurance performance in this sport, we analyzed the results of the World Masters Athletic Championships in Mountain Running 2007. Additionally, to investigate the relationship between the individual VO 2 AT values and running times, laboratory tests were performed in 10 mountain runners. Results: The World Championships race times of the first 5 finishers of the 5-year age groups did not differ significantly from 35 to 49 years. The corresponding mean (± SD) values of the VO 2 AT were 68.0 ± 1.7 ml/min/kg in males and 58.1 ± 1.9 ml/min/kg in females. In the following age groups up to 70+ there was a decrease in the VO 2 AT of 29.1% in males and 33.9% in females. Conclusion: Thus, at the beginning of the 3rd millennium, elite mountain runners demonstrate that VO 2 AT and probably also VO 2max may be held at top levels in humans up to the age of 45–49 years in both sexes. Despite the following decrease, endurance capacity remains about 3.5-fold higher in elite mountain runners up to 70+ years when compared to their untrained peers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Although the performance decline in this study seemed to be slightly steeper in masters athletes than in sedentary persons of the general population, it is important to note that endurance performance remained about 3.5 times higher in older athletes [28].”
From Nutrition for Older Athletes: Focus on Sex-Differences (2021) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“training volume was identified as one of the most significant predictors of aerobic capacity [34,57,59].”
From Effects of Aging on Determinants of Endurance Performance in Women Masters Athletes: A Scoping Review (2026) · cites this paper as [59]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 10.2165%2F00007256-200434070-00005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097%2F00005768-200212000-00032 · DOI
Cited by
Role of dietary protein and muscular fitness on longevity and aging
Strasser, B., Volaklis, K., Fuchs, D., & Burtscher, M. (2018) · Aging and Disease · doi:10.14336/ad.2017.0202 · Cited by 78
Nutrition for Older Athletes: Focus on Sex-Differences
Strasser, B., Pesta, D., Rittweger, J., Burtscher, J., & Burtscher, M. (2021) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu13051409 · Cited by 25
Self-citationVangsgaard, D., Noumi, M., Hayden, K. A., & Doyle-Baker, P. K. (2026) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare14081080
Metadata
- Authors
- Burtscher, M., Förster, H., & Burtscher, J.
- Venue
- Gerontology
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 268-271
- ISSN
- 0304-324X
- 1423-0003
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.karger.com/Services/SiteLicenses (vor)
- www.karger.com/Services/SiteLicenses (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
