The DOI matches its Crossref record.
STUDIES ON SIMILARITY DIAGNOSIS IN TWINS WITH THE AID OF MAILED QUESTIONNAIRES
Abstract
Research Articles| July 31 2008 STUDIES ON SIMILARITY DIAGNOSIS IN TWINS WITH THE AID OF MAILED QUESTIONNAIRES Subject Area: Genetics R. Cederlöf; R. Cederlöf From the Department of General Hygiene, National Institute of Public Health, the Department of Hygiene, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Lund, Sweden Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar L. Friberg; L. Friberg From the Department of General Hygiene, National Institute of Public Health, the Department of Hygiene, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Lund, Sweden Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar E. Jonsson; E. Jonsson From the Department of General Hygiene, National Institute of Public Health, the Department of Hygiene, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Lund, Sweden Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar L. Kaij L. Kaij From the Department of General Hygiene, National Institute of Public Health, the Department of Hygiene, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Lund, Sweden Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Acta Genetica et Statistica Medica (1961) 11 (4): 338–362. https://doi.org/10.1159/000151168 Article history Published Online: July 31 2008 Content Tools Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation R. Cederlöf, L. Friberg, E. Jonsson, L. Kaij; STUDIES ON SIMILARITY DIAGNOSIS IN TWINS WITH THE AID OF MAILED QUESTIONNAIRES. Acta Genetica et Statistica Medica 1 April 1961; 11 (4): 338–362. https://doi.org/10.1159/000151168 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll JournalsActa Genetica et Statistica Medica Search Advanced Search Article PDF first page preview Close Modal This content is only available via PDF. 1961Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements. You do not currently have access to this content.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Altruism and aggression: The heritability of individual differences.
Rushton, J. P. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.50.6.1192 · Cited by 517
Model-fitting approaches to the analysis of human behaviour
Eaves, L. J., Last, K. A., Young, P. A., & Martin, N. G. (1978) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.1978.101 · Cited by 457
Seddon, J. M. (2005) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.123.3.321 · Cited by 446
Neuropsychological Assessment of Monozygotic Twins Discordant for Schizophrenia
Goldberg, T. E. (1990) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1990.01810230082013 · Cited by 384
Genetic covariation between neuroticism and the symptoms of anxiety and depression
Jardine, R., Martin, N. G., Henderson, A. S., & Rao, D. C. (1984) · Genetic Epidemiology · doi:10.1002/gepi.1370010202 · Cited by 351
Metadata
- Authors
- Cederlöf, R., Friberg, L., Jonsson, E., & Kaij, L.
- Venue
- Human Heredity
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 1961
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 338-362
- ISSN
- 0001-5652 (ISSN-L)
- 1423-0062
- OpenAlex
- W1509840577
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: STUDIES ON SIMILARITY DIAGNOSIS IN TWINS WITH THE AID OF MAILED QUESTIONNAIRES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000151168
- The paper
- Cederlöf, R., Friberg, L., Jonsson, E., & Kaij, L. (1961). STUDIES ON SIMILARITY DIAGNOSIS IN TWINS WITH THE AID OF MAILED QUESTIONNAIRES. Human Heredity. https://doi.org/10.1159/000151168
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.