Cited by 457Animal Behavior and ReproductionGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock

Model-fitting approaches to the analysis of human behaviour

Open access
Eaves, L J, Last, Krystyna A, Young, P A, Martin, N G·1978·Heredity

Abstract

Model-fitting methods are now prominent in the analysis of human behavioural variation. Various ways of specifying models have been proposed. These are identical in their simplest form but differ in the emphasis given to more subtle sources of variation. The biometrical genetical approach allows flexibility in the specification of non-additive factors. Given additivity, the approach of path analysis may be used to specify several environmental models in the presence of assortative mating. In many cases the methods should yield identical conclusions. Several statistical methods have been proposed for parameter estimation and hypothesis testing. The most suitable rely on the method of maximum likelihood for the estimation of variance and covariance components. Any multifactorial model can be formulated in these terms. The choice of method will depend chiefly on the design of the experiment and the ease with which a data summary can be obtained without significant loss of information. Examples are given in which the causes of variation show different degrees of detectable complexity. A variety of experimental designs yield behavioural data which illustrate the contribution of additive and non-additive genetical effects, the mating system, sibling and cultural effects, the interaction of genetical effects with age and sex. The discrimination between alternative hypotheses is often difficult. The extension of the approach to the analysis of multiple measurements and discontinuous traits is considered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/hdy.1978.101

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The biometric model explains phenotypic variation as influenced by additive genetic factors (A), non-additive genetic effects (D), shared environmental factors (C) and non-shared environmental factors (E).

    “The biometric model explains phenotypic variation as influenced by additive genetic factors (A), non-additive genetic effects (D), shared environmental factors (C) and non-shared environmental factors (E) (Eaves, Last, Young, & Martin, 1978; Fisher, 1918; Jinks & Fulker, 1970).”

    From Stressful life events increase the risk of major depressive episodes: A population-based twin study (2023) · cites this paper as Eaves, Last, Young, & Martin, 1978

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eaves, L. J., Last, K. A., Young, P. A., & Martin, N. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • Australian National University (AU)
Venue
Heredity
Published
1978-12
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
249-320
ISSN
  • 0018-067X (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2540
OpenAlex
W2052506025
Cited by
457
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 6
FWCI
12.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Heredity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Keywords
model fitting, quantitative genetics, path analysis, assortative mating, non-additive genetic effects, additive genetic effects, environmental models, maximum likelihood estimation, multi-factor models, experimental design, sibling effects, cultural influence, gene-environment interaction, sex differences, age effects, multiple measurements
MeSH terms
Adoption, Environment, Female, Genetics, Behavioral, Genetics, Medical, Genotype, Humans, Mathematics, Models, Biological, Pedigree, Phenotype, Pregnancy, Twins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review