The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of Habitat Quality and Hunting Pressure on Arboreal Folivore Densities in Neotropical Forests: A Case Study of Howler Monkeys (Alouatta spp.)
Abstract
This large-scale geographic comparison examines the effects of subsistence hunting pressure and several indirect indicators of habitat quality on the abundance of howler monkeys {Alouatta spp.), the best studied and the most folivorous of all platyrrhine primates. Alouatta population densities were obtained from a standardized series of line-transect censuses undertaken at 23 Amazonian forest sites (1987–1995), including annually flooded (várzea), unflooded (terra firme), and eastern Amazonian transitional terra firme forests. A total of 83 density estimates from elsewhere were compiled from a comprehensive review of field studies from southern Mexico to northern Argentina. Howler density and biomass in Neotropical forests is profoundly affected by degree of hunting pressure, structural heterogeneity of the forest canopy, and to a lesser extent, the rainfall seasonality, total rainfall, and latitude of a given site. Mild gradients of forest elevation were a poor predictor of howler densities. In evergreen forests of lowland Amazonia, distance to major white-water rivers, which covaries with forest heterogeneity and soil fertility, is the best single predictor of howler densities. In Amazonia, habitat-specific patterns of distribution and abundance of Alouatta and other arboreal folivores conform to geochemical gradients determined by watershed types and their consequences for soil fertility. Results presented here confirm suggestions for Old World generalist herbivores that howler monkeys face strong dietary constraints which are most likely related to quality, phenology and productivity of digestible foliage during periods of resource scarcity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Effects of Subsistence Hunting on Vertebrate Community Structure in Amazonian Forests
Peres, C. A. (2000) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98485.x · Cited by 660
Self-citationGeneral guidelines for standardizing line-transect surveys of tropical forest primates
Peres, C. A. (1999) · Neotropical Primates · doi:10.62015/np.1999.v7.414 · Cited by 299
Self-citationPeres, C. A., & Lake, I. R. (2003) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01413.x · Cited by 195
Self-citationArboreal ant abundance tracks primary productivity in an Amazonian whitewater river system
Pringle, E. G., Santos, T. F. D., Gonçalves, M. S., Hawes, J. E., Peres, C. A., & Baccaro, F. B. (2019) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.2902 · Cited by 19
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Peres, C. A.
- Venue
- Folia Primatologica
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 1997-02-14
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 3-5
- Pages
- 199-222
- ISSN
- 0015-5713 (ISSN-L)
- 1421-9980
- OpenAlex
- W2059833563
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Habitat Quality and Hunting Pressure on Arboreal Folivore Densities in Neotropical Forests: A Case Study of Howler Monkeys (Alouatta spp.). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000157247
- The paper
- Peres, C. A. (1997). Effects of Habitat Quality and Hunting Pressure on Arboreal Folivore Densities in Neotropical Forests: A Case Study of Howler Monkeys (Alouatta spp.). Folia Primatologica. https://doi.org/10.1159/000157247
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.