The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Extent of Nontimber Resource Extraction in Tropical Forests: Accessibility to Game Vertebrates by Hunters in the Amazon Basin
Abstract
Abstract: Extractive activities targeting a wide range of nontimber forest products ( NTFPs ) are ubiquitous in tropical forests, yet the extent of structurally intact forests in a given region affected by this form of cryptic disturbance is poorly documented. We conducted a basin‐wide geographic information system analysis of the nonmotorized accessibility of Amazonian NTFP extraction and estimated the proportion of the Amazon drainage basin within Brazil ( 3.74 million km 2 ) that can be accessed on foot from the nearest navigable river or functional road. We use a long‐term series of standardized line‐transect vertebrate censuses conducted throughout the region to illustrate the effects of physical accessibility on wildlife densities in terms of hunting pressure as a function of distance from the nearest point of access. Population abundance in large‐bodied, prime‐target species preferred by game hunters tended to increase at greater distances from the access matrix, whereas small‐bodied species ignored by hunters usually showed the reverse trend. In addition, we estimated the proportion of presumably inviolate core areas within nature, extractive, and indigenous reserves of Brazilian Amazonia that are prohibitively remote and unlikely to be overhunted; for instance, only 1.16% of the basin‐wide area is strictly protected on paper and is reasonably safe from extractive activities targeted to game vertebrates and other valuable NTFPs. Finally, we discuss the concept of truly undisturbed wildlands in the last major tropical forest regions by distinguishing potentially overharvested areas from those that remain largely or entirely pristine and that maintain viable populations of a full complement of harvest‐sensitive species.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Changes in forest composition that occurred in the absence of major fire or forest opening events may be a part of natural forest dynamics or an indirect effect of hunting activities.
“Changes in forest composition that occurred in the absence of major fire or forest opening events may be a part of natural forest dynamics or an indirect effect of hunting activities”
From Pre‐contact and post‐colonial ecological legacies shape Surinamese rainforests (2024) · cites this paper as Peres & Lake, 2003
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 47
- Ayres J. M., 1991, Neotropical wildlife use and conservation, 82
- 10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00177-X · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.96022.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.291.5501.125 · DOI
- Bryant D., 1997, The last frontier forests: ecosystems and economies on the edge
- Biodiversity Support Program, 1995, A regional analysis of geographic priorities for biodiversity conservation in Latin America and the Caribbean
- 10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00130-X · DOI
- Chin C. L. M., 2000, Borneo 2000: environment, conservation and land, 29
- 10.1038/35010105 · DOI
- 10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0642:BHTBAS]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Emperaire L., 2000, Uma abordagem ecológica comparativa
- 10.1006/jtbi.1999.1060 · DOI
- Eves H. E., 2000, Hunting for sustainability in tropical forests, 427
- 10.1017/S0376892900014740 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.207 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2404948 · DOI
- Groombridge B., 2000, Global biodiversity: Earth's living resources in the 21st century
- IBGE, 1995, Amazônia legal
- IBGE, 2000, Base de informações municipais ( CD‐ROM ). 2a edição
- 10.1016/0040-5809(91)90053-I · DOI
- 10.1093/oso/9780195095548.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2000.99073.x · DOI
- 10.1126/science.291.5503.438 · DOI
- 10.1038/336533a0 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2000.98402.x · DOI
- Nepstad D., 2001, Road paving, fire regime feedbacks, and the future of Amazon forests., Forest Ecology and Management, 5524, 1
- 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98452.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1159/000157247 · DOI
- Peres C. A., 1999, General guidelines for standardizing line‐transect surveys of tropical forest primates., Neotropical Primates, 7, 11, 10.62015/np.1999.v7.414 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98485.x · DOI · Paper page
- Peres C. A., 2000, Hunting for sustainability in tropical forests, 31
- 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.01089.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02132-2 · DOI
- Peres C. A., 2002, Making parks work: strategies for preserving tropical nature, 137
- 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09010034.x · DOI
- Peters C. M., 1994, Sustainable harvest of nontimber plant resources in tropical moist forest: an ecological primer
- 10.2307/1311860 · DOI · Paper page
- Ricardo F., 1999, Terras Indigenas na Amazônia legal
- Richards M., 1993, The potential of nontimber forest products in sustainable natural forest management in Amazonia., Commonwealth Forestry Review, 72, 2127
- Robinson J. G., 2000, Hunting for sustainability in tropical forests, 13
- Sá R. M. L., 2000, Áreas protegidas ou espaços ameaçados?
- Terborgh J., 1999, Continental conservation: scientific foundations of regional reserve networks, 199
- Terborgh J., 2001, Rescuing tropical nature: making parks work, 307
- 10.1111/j.1523-1739.1989.tb00065.x · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99084.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1523-1739.1989.tb00241.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2000.99102.x · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity
Rodrigues, A. S. L., Andelman, S. J., Bakarr, M. I., Boitani, L., Brooks, T. M., Cowling, R. M., Fishpool, L. D. C., da Fonseca, G. A. B., Gaston, K. J., Hoffmann, M., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02422 · Cited by 1,525
Impacts of roads and linear clearings on tropical forests
Laurance, W. F., Goosem, M., & Laurance, S. G. W. (2009) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.06.009 · Cited by 1,243
The impact of hunting on tropical mammal and bird populations
Benítez-López, A., Alkemade, R., Schipper, A. M., Ingram, D. J., Verweij, P. A., Eikelboom, J. A. J., & Huijbregts, M. A. J. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaj1891 · Cited by 663
Menton, M. C. S., Merry, F. D., Lawrence, A., & Brown, N. (2009) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-02831-140139 · Cited by 42
Pre‐contact and post‐colonial ecological legacies shape Surinamese rainforests
Witteveen, N. H., White, C., Sánchez‐Martínez, B. A., Philip, A., Boyd, F., Booij, R., Christ, R., Singh, S., Gosling, W. D., Piperno, D. R., et al. (2024) · Ecology · doi:10.1002/ecy.4272 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Peres, C. A., & Lake, I. R.
- Venue
- Conservation Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-03-25
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 521-535
- ISSN
- 0888-8892
- 1523-1739
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review