Cited by 23Lipid metabolism and disordersLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthChronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes

Effect of gemfibrozil on lipoprotein abnormalities in chronic renal insufficiency: a controlled study in human chronic renal disease

Samuelsson, O., Attman, P.-O., Knight-Gibson, C., Kron, B., Larsson, R., Mulec, H., Weiss, L., Alaupovic, P.·2008·Nephron

Abstract

Background Renal dyslipoproteinemia is characterized by the accumulation of intact and partially metabolized triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. Reduced lipolytic enzyme activities may be one of the major pathophysiological mechanisms contributing to a retarded catabolism of these lipoproteins in patients with renal insufficiency. Objective To evaluate the effect of gemfibrozil treatment on renal dyslipoproteinemia. Study design A randomized, controlled open study with 2 parallel groups. Outcome variables Plasma concentrations of lipids, apolipoproteins and lipoprotein particles. Patients and methods Fifty-seven non-nephrotic, non-diabetic patients with moderately advanced renal insufficiency were randomized to either treatment with gemfibrozil at dosages from 300 to 900 mg/day (n = 28) or dietary counseling (n = 29). The intervention period was 12 months. Plasma concentrations of lipids, apolipoproteins and apoA- and apoB-containing lipoprotein particles were determined at the entry and after 6 and 12 months of treatment. Results No serious adverse effects occurred during the study. Six patients experienced mild gastrointestinal symptoms and prematurely withdrew from the drug treatment. In the group treated with gemfibrozil the plasma concentrations of triglycerides, total cholesterol, very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) and low density (LDL) cholesterol decreased significantly by 47, 13, 43 and 14%, respectively, in comparison to baseline. High density lipoprotein (HDL) cholest…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000189551

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Overall, 4 trials had a Jadad score of 4, 1 scored 3, 2 scored 2, and 1 scored 1.

    “Overall, 4 trials had a Jadad score of 4 (24,25,32,35), 1 scored 3 (33), 2 scored 2 (29,31), and 1 scored 1 (30).”

    From Effects of Fibrates in Kidney Disease (2012) · cites this paper as [31]

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Samuelsson, O., Attman, P.-O., Knight-Gibson, C., Kron, B., Larsson, R., Mulec, H., Weiss, L., & Alaupovic, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation (US)
Venue
Nephron
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2008-12-19
Volume
75
Issue
3
Pages
286-294
ISSN
  • 1660-8151 (ISSN-L)
  • 2235-3186
OpenAlex
W2067361204
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Nephron journals/Nephron journals (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
Keywords
gemfibrozil, chronic renal insufficiency, triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, apolipoproteins, lipoprotein particles, nutrition counseling, lipid metabolism, apolipoprotein B, apolipoprotein C-III, apolipoprotein E, VLDL, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein
MeSH terms
Hypolipidemic Agents, Apolipoproteins, Cholesterol, Female, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Humans, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Lipids, Lipoproteins, Male, Middle Aged, Gemfibrozil

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review