Cited by 163Acute Kidney Injury ResearchRenal Transplantation Outcomes and TreatmentsChronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes

Fibrate‐induced increase in blood urea and creatinine: is gemfibrozil the only innocuous agent?

Broeders, Nilufer, Knoop, Christiane, Antoine, Martine, Tielemans, Christian, Abramowicz, Daniel·2000·Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Some reports indicate that fibrates can induce renal dysfunction. However, the clinical characteristics of these episodes, and the respective nephrotoxicity of the four main fibrates used-namely, fenofibrate, bezafibrate, ciprofibrate, and gemfibrozil-remain ill defined. METHODS: To better characterize this side-effect, we first reviewed the charts of 27 patients from our institution who developed an impairment of renal function during fibrate therapy. We next analysed the articles (n=24) that contained data on renal function in patients taking fibrates (n=2676). RESULTS: Among our 27 patients, 25 were on fenofibrate therapy, one was taking bezafibrate, and one ciprofibrate. Nineteen were recipients of solid-organ transplants (kidney recipients, n=15; heart or heart-lung recipients, n=4), and eight were non-transplanted patients with some impairment of renal function. Baseline plasma creatinine ranged from 0.9 to 2.9 mg/dl. It increased by a mean of 40% after the start of fibrate therapy. There was a concomitant increase of blood urea values (mean 36%) in most of the patients. Renal function returned to baseline in 18/24 patients after fibrate discontinuation. However, six patients, all transplant recipients, experienced a permanent increase in plasma creatinine. The incidence of fibrate-induced renal dysfunction among our series of kidney transplant recipients was 60%, as it occurred in 15 of the 25 patients who had ever taken fibrates. An increase of mean creatinine values during therapy was described in all papers on fenofibrate (n=7) and bezafibrate (n=8) (range 8-18% and 8-40% respectively), and in three of four papers dealing with ciprofibrate (range 6-16%). No significant renal impairment was described in any of the eight articles reporting data on gemfibrozil therapy. CONCLUSION: Therapy with fenofibrate, bezafibrate, and ciprofibrate may induce renal dysfunction. Gemfibrozil appears to be devoid of this side-effect.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ndt/15.12.1993

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Drug-induced elevations in serum creatinine have been reported in those with mild to moderate renal failure and renal transplant recipients.

    “Drug-induced elevations in serum creatinine have been reported in those with mild to moderate renal failure (46) and renal transplant recipients (47,48)”

    From Effects of Fibrates in Kidney Disease (2012) · cites this paper as [47]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. References and safety of ciprofibrate in patients with primary hyperlipide- mia. Curr Ther Res 1992; 51: 750-762
  2. Hirai M, Tatuso E, Sakurai M, Ichikawa M, Matsuya F, Saito canoic acid. Arch Toxicol 1995; 69: 491-497

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Broeders, N., Knoop, C., Antoine, M., Tielemans, C., & Abramowicz, D.
Affiliations
Erasmus Hospital (BE)
Venue
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
Published
2000-12-01
Volume
15
Issue
12
Pages
1993-1999
ISSN
  • 0931-0509 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2385
OpenAlex
W2099822840
Cited by
163
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Acute Kidney Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Transplantation › Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
Keywords
fibrates, nephrotoxicity, renal dysfunction, gemfibrozil, fenofibrate, bezafibrate, ciprofibrate, blood urea, serum creatinine, kidney transplant recipients, drug-induced nephrotoxicity
MeSH terms
Hypolipidemic Agents, Bezafibrate, Clofibric Acid, Creatinine, Humans, Kidney Diseases, Postoperative Period, Fenofibrate, Retrospective Studies, Urea, Gemfibrozil, Kidney Transplantation, Fibric Acids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review