Cited by 52Pharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismEthics in Clinical ResearchPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Assessing Patient Readiness for the Clinical Adoption of Personalized Medicine

Issa, A.M., Tufail, W., Hutchinson, J., Tenorio, J., Baliga, M. Poonam·2009·Public Health Genomics

Abstract

Background/Aims: Although pharmacogenomics-based diagnostics and therapeutics are increasingly being translated into personalized medicine applications, relatively little evidence exists about how novel pharmacogenomics-based technologies will be accepted and adopted by patients. It is important to understand the characteristics of genomic diagnostics and targeted therapeutics that might impact utilization or serve as barriers to adoption of these novel technologies in order to formulate appropriate policies and procedures. The objective of this study was to investigate patients’ understanding and knowledge of personalized medicine and the process of decision-making regarding pharmacogenomics testing and targeted therapeutics and to better understand how patients value receiving pharmacogenomics-based care. Methods: We conducted 4 focus groups with 8–10 individuals in each group with patients recruited from out-patient clinics at The Methodist Hospital in Houston, Tex., USA. Results: The use of genomic diagnostics and targeted therapeutics to facilitate personalized medicine has considerable support from patients. However, our data revealed that participants were concerned with issues surrounding privacy and confidentiality of genetic test results, particularly with respect to access of information by insurers, with potential costs of testing and issues related to accuracy of test results. Questions regarding willingness to pay revealed that patients would be more willing to pay out-of-pocket if the disease associated with pharmacogenomic testing for treatment was perceived to be high risk (e.g., colorectal cancer) versus a chronic condition that was perceived as lower risk (e.g., high cholesterol). Conclusion: As the personalized medicine approach is increasingly incorporated into health care, understanding patients’ needs and their readiness to adopt these novel technologies will become progressively more important for the development of appropriate health policies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000189629

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Issa, A. M., Tufail, W., Hutchinson, J., Tenorio, J., & Baliga, M. P.
Affiliations
  • Houston Methodist Research Institute (US)
  • University of Houston (US)
Venue
Public Health Genomics
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2009
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
163-169
ISSN
  • 1422-2795 (ISSN-L)
  • 1662-4246
  • 1662-8063
OpenAlex
W2076861819
Cited by
52
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Public Health Genomics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Greenwall Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
personalized medicine, pharmacogenomics, patient acceptance, genomic diagnostics, targeted therapeutics, willingness to pay, patient decision-making, patient knowledge, health policy
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Decision Making, Drug Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Personal Health Services, Pharmacogenetics, Molecular Diagnostic Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review