Cited by 133EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesGaze Tracking and Assistive TechnologyNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

Review of Wireless and Wearable Electroencephalogram Systems and Brain-Computer Interfaces – A Mini-Review

Lin, Chin-Teng, Ko, Li-Wei, Chang, Meng-Hsiu, Duann, Jeng-Ren, Chen, Jing-Ying, Su, Tung-Ping, Jung, Tzyy-Ping·2010·Gerontology

Abstract

Biomedical signal monitoring systems have rapidly advanced in recent years, propelled by significant advances in electronic and information technologies. Brain-computer interface (BCI) is one of the important research branches and has become a hot topic in the study of neural engineering, rehabilitation, and brain science. Traditionally, most BCI systems use bulky, wired laboratory-oriented sensing equipments to measure brain activity under well-controlled conditions within a confined space. Using bulky sensing equipments not only is uncomfortable and inconvenient for users, but also impedes their ability to perform routine tasks in daily operational environments. Furthermore, owing to large data volumes, signal processing of BCI systems is often performed off-line using high-end personal computers, hindering the applications of BCI in real-world environments. To be practical for routine use by unconstrained, freely-moving users, BCI systems must be noninvasive, nonintrusive, lightweight and capable of online signal processing. This work reviews recent online BCI systems, focusing especially on wearable, wireless and real-time systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000230807

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A different approach to direct measurement of trembling legs or arms is to use the EEG signal in the framework of a Brain Computer Interface (BCI).

    “A different approach to the direct measurement of trembling legs or arms is to use the EEG signal in the framework of a Brain Computer Interface (BCI) [62].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, C.-T., Ko, L.-W., Chang, M.-H., Duann, J.-R., Chen, J.-Y., Su, T.-P., & Jung, T.-P.
Affiliations
  • National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Taipei Veterans General Hospital (TW)
Venue
Gerontology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2009-07-25
Volume
56
Issue
1
Pages
112-119
ISSN
  • 0304-324X (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0003
OpenAlex
W2018730537
Cited by
133
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
0.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Gerontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Council (NSC 97-2627-E-009-001)
  • Shanghai Educational Development Foundation
  • National Chiao Tung University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Keywords
brain-computer interface, wearable EEG, wireless EEG, real-time signal processing, real-time BCI, neural engineering, rehabilitation
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Brain Diseases, Communication Devices for People with Disabilities, Communication Aids for Disabled, Electroencephalography, Humans, Telemetry, User-Computer Interface

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review