Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 276

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mismatch Negativity-The Measure for Central Sound Representation Accuracy

Näätänen, Risto, Alho, Kimmo·1997·Audiology and Neurotology

Abstract

The mismatch negativity (MMN), elicited by any discriminable change in a repetitive sound even when this sound is not attended to, provides a pre-perceptual physiological measure of the accuracy of the central sound representation in the human brain. This accuracy, which can be measured separately for the different features of the sound, determines the individual's sound discrimination accuracy in normal and various pathological conditions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000259255

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 276

Metadata

Authors
Näätänen, R., & Alho, K.
Venue
Audiology and Neurotology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
1997
Volume
2
Issue
5
Pages
341-353
ISSN
  • 1420-3030 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9700
OpenAlex
W2048288516
Cited by
276
References
0
FWCI
4.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mismatch Negativity-The Measure for Central Sound Representation Accuracy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000259255
The paper
Näätänen, R., & Alho, K. (1997). Mismatch Negativity-The Measure for Central Sound Representation Accuracy. Audiology and Neurotology. https://doi.org/10.1159/000259255

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.