The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How Adults and Children Search and Recognize Pictures
Abstract
The eye fixations of 20 young adults and 20 children, aged six, were recorded while they were recognizing or inspecting a series of displays. The test photographs presented three levels of definition for one particular scene: very blurred, blurred, or sharp. Each picture was presented for two 10-second trials. Either the very blurred or the sharp picture was given first to a particular S. The eye tracks were therefore recorded either during attempts at visual comprehension or during casual inspection. The position and sequence of the fixations of each S were recorded individually on a Polaroid copy of the original display. Eight different analysis procedures were used to study the eye tracks and all showed reliable differences between adults and children. With the sharp pictures, children lacked adequate coverage of the display; their eye tracks averaged only two-thirds the length of the adult tracks, mostly because children had twice as many very small eve movements. Adults were more skillful at visually selecting the informative areas within out-of-focus pictures; this skill calls for a delicate balance between central and peripheral vision. Children were less consistent than adults in regard to the areas they visually selected from the out-of-focus displays. Only adults attempted to relate important areas of such displays by long leaping movements of the eyes. The direction of these long movements altered when S already knew the nature of the display. Adult fixation times increased by 40 % when .Ss had to comprehend the out-of-focus displays rather than merely inspect them. In the second part of the paper, theoretical interpretations are provided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception
Navon, D. (1977) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(77)90012-3 · Cited by 4,005
Eye fixations and cognitive processes
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1976) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(76)90015-3 · Cited by 1,730
Visual scanning of faces in autism
Pelphrey, K. A., Sasson, N. J., Reznick, J. S., Paul, G., Goldman, B. D., & Piven, J. (2002) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1023/a:1016374617369 · Cited by 1,187
Eye movements in reading and information processing.
Rayner, K. (1978) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.85.3.618 · Cited by 1,119
Marcel, A. J. (1983) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(83)90010-5 · Cited by 905
Metadata
- Authors
- Mackworth, N. H., & Bruner, J. S.
- Venue
- Human Development
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 1970
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 149-177
- ISSN
- 0018-716X (ISSN-L)
- 1423-0054
- OpenAlex
- W1964307771
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Adults and Children Search and Recognize Pictures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000270887
- The paper
- Mackworth, N. H., & Bruner, J. S. (1970). How Adults and Children Search and Recognize Pictures. Human Development. https://doi.org/10.1159/000270887
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.