The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anti-Fat Prejudice Reduction: A Review of Published Studies
Open accessAbstract
Prejudice against those who are perceived as 'fat' or obese (anti-fat prejudice) is rife, increasing, and associated with negative outcomes for those targeted for such treatment. The present review sought to identify and describe published research on interventions to reduce anti-fat prejudice. A systematic search of relevant databases (e.g. PsychInfo, PubMed, Scopus) found 16 published studies that had sought to reduce anti-fat prejudice. Most notable was the lack of research on interventions for reducing anti-fat prejudice. Methodological problems that limit the interpretability of results were identified in the majority of studies found. Interventions employing more rigorous experimental designs provided at best mixed evidence for effectiveness. Although several studies reported changes in beliefs and knowledge about the causes of obesity, reductions in anti-fat prejudice did not typically accompany these changes. Anti-fat prejudice interventions adopting social norm- and social consensus-based approaches appear encouraging but are scarce. The lack of prejudice reduction following most interventions suggests that psychological mechanisms other than, or additional to, those being manipulated may underpin anti-fat prejudice. New directions for researching anti-fat prejudice are suggested. Given the strength of antipathy displayed toward those who are perceived as 'fat' or obese, research in this area is urgently required.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004) · Political Psychology · doi:10.4324/9780203505984-16 · Cited by 13,467
The Stigma of Obesity: A Review and Update
Puhl, R. M., & Heuer, C. A. (2009) · Obesity · doi:10.1038/oby.2008.636 · Cited by 3,323
Batson, C. D., Polycarpou, M. P., Harmon-Jones, E., Imhoff, H. J., Mitchener, E. C., Bednar, L. L., Klein, T. R., & Highberger, L. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.105 · Cited by 1,463
Changes in Perceived Weight Discrimination Among Americans, 1995–1996 Through 2004–2006
Andreyeva, T., Puhl, R. M., & Brownell, K. D. (2008) · Obesity · doi:10.1038/oby.2008.35 · Cited by 684
Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P. (2009) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699930802110007 · Cited by 574
Teachman, B. A., Gapinski, K. D., Brownell, K. D., Rawlins, M., & Jeyaram, S. (2003) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.22.1.68 · Cited by 536
Disgust sensitivity predicts intuitive disapproval of gays
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., Knobe, J., & Bloom, P. (2009) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0015960 · Cited by 466
A meta-analysis of empirical studies of weight-based bias in the workplace
Rudolph, C. W., Wells, C. L., Weller, M. D., & Baltes, B. B. (2009) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2008.09.008 · Cited by 228
Cited by
Impact of weight bias and stigma on quality of care and outcomes for patients with obesity
Phelan, S. M., Burgess, D. J., Yeazel, M. W., Hellerstedt, W. L., Griffin, J. M., & van Ryn, M. (2015) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.12266 · Cited by 1,361
Weight stigma as a psychosocial contributor to obesity.
Puhl, R. M., Himmelstein, M. S., & Pearl, R. L. (2020) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000538 · Cited by 452
Obesity Stigma: Causes, Consequences, and Potential Solutions
Westbury, S., Oyebode, O., van Rens, T., & Barber, T. M. (2023) · Current Obesity Reports · doi:10.1007/s13679-023-00495-3 · Cited by 317
A multinational examination of weight bias: predictors of anti-fat attitudes across four countries
Puhl, R. M., Latner, J. D., O'Brien, K., Luedicke, J., Danielsdottir, S., & Forhan, M. (2015) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/ijo.2015.32 · Cited by 315
Self-citationWeight Bias and Stigma: Public Health Implications and Structural Solutions
Pearl, R. L. (2018) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/sipr.12043 · Cited by 278
Metadata
- Authors
- Daníelsdóttir, S., O’Brien, K. S., & Ciao, A.
- Venue
- Obesity Facts
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2010
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-58
- ISSN
- 1662-4025 (ISSN-L)
- 1662-4033
- OpenAlex
- W2059527704
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 28.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anti-Fat Prejudice Reduction: A Review of Published Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000277067
- The paper
- Daníelsdóttir, S., O’Brien, K. S., & Ciao, A. (2010). Anti-Fat Prejudice Reduction: A Review of Published Studies. Obesity Facts. https://doi.org/10.1159/000277067
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.