The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A multinational examination of weight bias: predictors of anti-fat attitudes across four countries
Abstract
Background/objectives As rates of obesity have increased throughout much of the world, so too have bias and prejudice toward people with higher body weight (that is, weight bias). Despite considerable evidence of weight bias in the United States, little work has examined its extent and antecedents across different nations. The present study conducted a multinational examination of weight bias in four Western countries with comparable prevalence rates of adult overweight and obesity. Methods Using comprehensive self-report measures with 2866 individuals in Canada, the United States, Iceland and Australia, the authors assessed (1) levels of explicit weight bias (using the Fat Phobia Scale and the Universal Measure of Bias) and multiple sociodemographic predictors (for example, sex, age, race/ethnicity and educational attainment) of weight-biased attitudes and (2) the extent to which weight-related variables, including participants' own body weight, personal experiences with weight bias and causal attributions of obesity, play a role in expressions of weight bias in different countries. Results The extent of weight bias was consistent across countries, and in each nation attributions of behavioral causes of obesity predicted stronger weight bias, as did beliefs that obesity is attributable to lack of willpower and personal responsibility. In addition, across all countries the magnitude of weight bias was stronger among men and among individuals without family or friends who had…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Evidence from several countries shows that when individuals attribute the causes of obesity primarily to internal, controllable factors or personal choices, they exhibit higher weight bias, whereas acknowledging the complex causes of obesity, including genetics, biology, and environmental factors, is associated with lower levels of weight bias and less blame.
“Evidence from several countries68–71 shows that when individuals attribute the causes of obesity primarily to internal, controllable factors or personal choices, they exhibit higher weight bias, whereas acknowledging the complex causes of obesity (including elements such as genetics, biology, and environmental factors) is associated with lower levels of weight bias and less blame.”
From Joint international consensus statement for ending stigma of obesity (2020) · cites this paper as [71]
Citations
Cites
Prevalence of Childhood and Adult Obesity in the United States, 2011-2012
Ogden, C. L., Carroll, M. D., Kit, B. K., & Flegal, K. M. (2014) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2014.732 · Cited by 8,072
The Stigma of Obesity: A Review and Update
Puhl, R. M., & Heuer, C. A. (2009) · Obesity · doi:10.1038/oby.2008.636 · Cited by 3,323
Self-citationGrabe, S., Ward, L. M., & Hyde, J. S. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.460 · Cited by 2,053
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- Puhl RM, Andreyeva T, Brownell KD . Perceptions of weight discrimination: prevalence and comparison to race and gender discrimination in America. Int J Obesity 2008; 32: 992–1000. · DOI · Paper page
- Hatzenbuehler ML, Keyes KM, Hasin DS . Associations between perceived weight discrimination and the prevalence of psychiatric disorders in the general population. Obesity 2009; 17: 2033–2039. · DOI
- Sutin AR, Terracciano A . Perceived weight discrimination and obesity. PLoS One 2013; 8: e70048. · DOI · Paper page
- Crandall CS . Prejudice against fat people. Ideology and self-interest. J Pers Soc Psychol 1994; 66: 882–894. · DOI
- Roehling MV, Roehling PV, Odland M . Investigating the validity of stereotypes about overweight employees: the relationship between body weight and normal personality traits. Grp Organiz Manage 2008; 33: 392–424. · DOI
- Sabin JA, Marini M, Nosek BA . Implicit and explicit anti-fat bias among a large sample of medical doctors by BMI, race/ethnicity and gender. PLoS One 2012; 7: e48448. · DOI · Paper page
- Schwartz MB, Vartanian LR, Nosek BA, Brownell KD . The influence of one's own body weight on implicit and explicit anti-fat bias. Obesity 2006; 14: 440–447. · DOI
- Latner JD, Ebneter DS, O’Brien KS . Residual obesity stigma. An experimental investigation of bias against obese and lean targets differing in weight-loss history. Obesity 2012; 20: 2035–2038. · DOI
- O’Brien KS, Puhl RM, Latner JD, Mir AS, Hunter JA . Reducing anti-fat prejudice in pre-service health students. A randomized trial. Obesity 2010; 18: 2138–2144. · DOI
- Crandall CS, Martinez R . Culture, ideology, and anti-fat attitudes. Pers Soc Psychol Bul 1996; 22: 1165–1176. · DOI
- Puhl RM, Schwartz MB, Brownell KD . Impact of perceived consensus on stereotypes about obese people: a new approach for reducing bias. Health Psychol 2005; 24: 517–525. · DOI
- Brewis AA, Wutich A, Falletta-Cowden A, Rodriguez-Soto I . Body norms and fat stigma in a global perspective. Cur Anthropology 2011; 52: 269–276. · DOI
- Crandall CS, D'Anello S, Sakalli N, Lazarus E, Nejtardt GW, Feather NT . An attribution-value model of prejudice: anti-fat attitudes in six nations. Pers Soc Psychol Bul 2001; 27: 30–37. · DOI
- Lewis S, Thomas SL, Blood RW, Castle DJ, Hyde J, Komesaroff PA . How do obese individuals perceive and respond to the different types of obesity stigma thatvthey encounter in their daily lives? A qualitative study. Soc Sci Med 2011; 73: 1349–1356. · DOI
- Ruggs EN, King EB, Hebl M, Fitzsimmons M . Assessment of weight stigma. Obes Facts 2010; 3: 60–69. · DOI
- Swinburn BA, Sacks G, Hall KD, McPherson K, Finegood DT, Moodie ML et al. The global obesity pandemic: shaped by global drivers and local environments. Lancet 2011; 378: 804–814. · DOI · Paper page
- Janssen I . The public health burden of obesity in Canada. Can J Diabetes 2013; 37: 90–96. · DOI
- Lonner WJ, Berry JW . Field Methods in Cross-Cultural Research. Sage: Beverly Hills, CA, 1986.
- Davis J, Busch J, Hammatt Z, Novotny R, Harrigan R, Grandinetti A et al. The relationship between ethnicity and obesity in Asian and Pacific Islander populations: a literature review. Ethn Dis 2004; 14: 111–118.
- Latner JD, Knight T, Illingworth K . Body image and self-esteem among Asian, Pacific Islander, and White college students in Hawaii and Australia. Eating Disorders. J Treat Prevent 2011; 19: 355–361.
- Bacon JG, Scheltema KE, Robinson BE . Fat Phobia Scale revisited: the short form. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2011; 25: 252–257. · DOI
- Latner JD, O’Brien KS, Durso LE, Brinkman LA, MacDonald T . Weighing obesity stigma. Relative strength of different targets of bias. Int J Obesity 2008; 32: 1145–1152. · DOI
- Puhl RM, Latner JL, King K, Luedicke J . Weight bias among professionals who treat eating disorders: associations with attitudes about treatment and perceptions of patient outcomes. Int J Eating Disord 2014; 47: 65–75. · DOI
- Foster GD, Wadden TA, Makris AP, Davidson D, Sanderson RS, Allison DB et al. Primary care physicians’ attitudes about obesity and its treatment. Obes Res 2003; 11: 1168–1177. · DOI · Paper page
- DePierre JA, Puhl RM, Luedicke J . A new stigmatized identity? Comparisons of a ‘Food Addict’ label with other stigmatized health conditions. Behav Soc Psychol 2013; 35: 10–21.
- O'Brien KS, Hunter JA, Halberstadt J, Anderson J . Body image and explicit and implicit anti-fat attitudes: the mediating role of physical appearance comparisons. Body Image 2007; 4: 249–256. · DOI
- Falkner NH, French SA, Jeffery RW, Neumark-Sztainer D, Sherwood NE, Morton M . Mistreatment due to weight: prevalence and sources of perceived mistreatment in women and men. Obes Res 1999; 7: 572–576. · DOI
- Durso LE, Latner JD . Understanding self-directed stigma: development of the Weight Bias Internalization Scale. Obesity 2008; 16: S80–S86. · DOI
- Danielsdottir S, O'Brien KS, Ciao A . Anti-fat prejudice reduction: a review of published studies. Obes Facts 2010; 3: 47–58. · DOI
- Tsai AG, Wadden TA . Systematic review: an evaluation of major commercial weight loss programs in the United States. Annals Intern Med 2005; 142: 56–66. · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Joint international consensus statement for ending stigma of obesity
Rubino, F., Puhl, R. M., Cummings, D. E., Eckel, R. H., Ryan, D. H., Mechanick, J. I., Nadglowski, J., Ramos Salas, X., Schauer, P. R., Twenefour, D., et al. (2020) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-0803-x · Cited by 1,152
“Evidence from several countries [68] [69] [70] [71] shows that when individuals attribute the causes of obesity primarily to internal, controllable factors or personal choices, they exhibit higher weight bias, whereas acknowledging the complex causes of obesity (including elements such as genetics, biology, and enviro…”
BackgroundWeight stigma as a psychosocial contributor to obesity.
Puhl, R. M., Himmelstein, M. S., & Pearl, R. L. (2020) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000538 · Cited by 452
Self-citationImplicit bias in healthcare: clinical practice, research and decision making
Gopal, D. P., Chetty, U., O'Donnell, P., Gajria, C., & Blackadder-Weinstein, J. (2021) · Future Healthcare Journal · doi:10.7861/fhj.2020-0233 · Cited by 298
Effective strategies in ending weight stigma in healthcare
Talumaa, B., Brown, A., Batterham, R. L., & Kalea, A. Z. (2022) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.13494 · Cited by 250
Puhl, R. M., Lessard, L. M., Himmelstein, M. S., & Foster, G. D. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0251566 · Cited by 233
Self-citationRyan, L., Coyne, R., Heary, C., Birney, S., Crotty, M., Dunne, R., Conlan, O., & Walsh, J. C. (2023) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.13606 · Cited by 149
Pudney, E. V., Himmelstein, M. S., Puhl, R. M., & Foster, G. D. (2020) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112854 · Cited by 37
Ending Weight Stigma to Advance Health Equity
Pearl, R. L., Donze, L. F., Rosas, L. G., Agurs-Collins, T., Baskin, M. L., Breland, J. Y., Byker Shanks, C., Cooksey Stowers, K., Johnson, S., Lee, B. Y., et al. (2024) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2024.06.021 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Puhl, R. M., Latner, J. D., O'Brien, K., Luedicke, J., Danielsdottir, S., & Forhan, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Connecticut (US)
- University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Puhl, R M
- Venue
- International Journal of Obesity
- Published
- 2015-03-20
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1166-1173
- ISSN
- 0307-0565 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5497
- OpenAlex
- W2128929078
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 21.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Obesity (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Rudd Foundation
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity and Health Practices
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- weight bias, anti-fat attitudes, weight stigma, fatphobia, sociodemographic predictors, sex differences, social support, cross-national comparison, stigma reduction
- MeSH terms
- Australia, Body Weight, Canada, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Female, Humans, Iceland, Male, Obesity, Prejudice, Social Perception, Stereotyping, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review