Cited by 315Obesity and Health PracticesObesity, Physical Activity, DietSocial and Intergroup Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A multinational examination of weight bias: predictors of anti-fat attitudes across four countries

Puhl, R M, Latner, J D, O'Brien, K, Luedicke, J, Danielsdottir, S, Forhan, M·2015·International Journal of Obesity

Abstract

Background/objectives As rates of obesity have increased throughout much of the world, so too have bias and prejudice toward people with higher body weight (that is, weight bias). Despite considerable evidence of weight bias in the United States, little work has examined its extent and antecedents across different nations. The present study conducted a multinational examination of weight bias in four Western countries with comparable prevalence rates of adult overweight and obesity. Methods Using comprehensive self-report measures with 2866 individuals in Canada, the United States, Iceland and Australia, the authors assessed (1) levels of explicit weight bias (using the Fat Phobia Scale and the Universal Measure of Bias) and multiple sociodemographic predictors (for example, sex, age, race/ethnicity and educational attainment) of weight-biased attitudes and (2) the extent to which weight-related variables, including participants' own body weight, personal experiences with weight bias and causal attributions of obesity, play a role in expressions of weight bias in different countries. Results The extent of weight bias was consistent across countries, and in each nation attributions of behavioral causes of obesity predicted stronger weight bias, as did beliefs that obesity is attributable to lack of willpower and personal responsibility. In addition, across all countries the magnitude of weight bias was stronger among men and among individuals without family or friends who had…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ijo.2015.32

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence from several countries shows that when individuals attribute the causes of obesity primarily to internal, controllable factors or personal choices, they exhibit higher weight bias, whereas acknowledging the complex causes of obesity, including genetics, biology, and environmental factors, is associated with lower levels of weight bias and less blame.

    “Evidence from several countries68–71 shows that when individuals attribute the causes of obesity primarily to internal, controllable factors or personal choices, they exhibit higher weight bias, whereas acknowledging the complex causes of obesity (including elements such as genetics, biology, and environmental factors) is associated with lower levels of weight bias and less blame.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Puhl RM, Andreyeva T, Brownell KD . Perceptions of weight discrimination: prevalence and comparison to race and gender discrimination in America. Int J Obesity 2008; 32: 992–1000. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Hatzenbuehler ML, Keyes KM, Hasin DS . Associations between perceived weight discrimination and the prevalence of psychiatric disorders in the general population. Obesity 2009; 17: 2033–2039. · DOI
  3. Sutin AR, Terracciano A . Perceived weight discrimination and obesity. PLoS One 2013; 8: e70048. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Crandall CS . Prejudice against fat people. Ideology and self-interest. J Pers Soc Psychol 1994; 66: 882–894. · DOI
  5. Roehling MV, Roehling PV, Odland M . Investigating the validity of stereotypes about overweight employees: the relationship between body weight and normal personality traits. Grp Organiz Manage 2008; 33: 392–424. · DOI
  6. Sabin JA, Marini M, Nosek BA . Implicit and explicit anti-fat bias among a large sample of medical doctors by BMI, race/ethnicity and gender. PLoS One 2012; 7: e48448. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Schwartz MB, Vartanian LR, Nosek BA, Brownell KD . The influence of one's own body weight on implicit and explicit anti-fat bias. Obesity 2006; 14: 440–447. · DOI
  8. Latner JD, Ebneter DS, O’Brien KS . Residual obesity stigma. An experimental investigation of bias against obese and lean targets differing in weight-loss history. Obesity 2012; 20: 2035–2038. · DOI
  9. O’Brien KS, Puhl RM, Latner JD, Mir AS, Hunter JA . Reducing anti-fat prejudice in pre-service health students. A randomized trial. Obesity 2010; 18: 2138–2144. · DOI
  10. Crandall CS, Martinez R . Culture, ideology, and anti-fat attitudes. Pers Soc Psychol Bul 1996; 22: 1165–1176. · DOI
  11. Puhl RM, Schwartz MB, Brownell KD . Impact of perceived consensus on stereotypes about obese people: a new approach for reducing bias. Health Psychol 2005; 24: 517–525. · DOI
  12. Brewis AA, Wutich A, Falletta-Cowden A, Rodriguez-Soto I . Body norms and fat stigma in a global perspective. Cur Anthropology 2011; 52: 269–276. · DOI
  13. Crandall CS, D'Anello S, Sakalli N, Lazarus E, Nejtardt GW, Feather NT . An attribution-value model of prejudice: anti-fat attitudes in six nations. Pers Soc Psychol Bul 2001; 27: 30–37. · DOI
  14. Lewis S, Thomas SL, Blood RW, Castle DJ, Hyde J, Komesaroff PA . How do obese individuals perceive and respond to the different types of obesity stigma thatvthey encounter in their daily lives? A qualitative study. Soc Sci Med 2011; 73: 1349–1356. · DOI
  15. Ruggs EN, King EB, Hebl M, Fitzsimmons M . Assessment of weight stigma. Obes Facts 2010; 3: 60–69. · DOI
  16. Swinburn BA, Sacks G, Hall KD, McPherson K, Finegood DT, Moodie ML et al. The global obesity pandemic: shaped by global drivers and local environments. Lancet 2011; 378: 804–814. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Janssen I . The public health burden of obesity in Canada. Can J Diabetes 2013; 37: 90–96. · DOI
  18. Lonner WJ, Berry JW . Field Methods in Cross-Cultural Research. Sage: Beverly Hills, CA, 1986.
  19. Davis J, Busch J, Hammatt Z, Novotny R, Harrigan R, Grandinetti A et al. The relationship between ethnicity and obesity in Asian and Pacific Islander populations: a literature review. Ethn Dis 2004; 14: 111–118.
  20. Latner JD, Knight T, Illingworth K . Body image and self-esteem among Asian, Pacific Islander, and White college students in Hawaii and Australia. Eating Disorders. J Treat Prevent 2011; 19: 355–361.
  21. Bacon JG, Scheltema KE, Robinson BE . Fat Phobia Scale revisited: the short form. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2011; 25: 252–257. · DOI
  22. Latner JD, O’Brien KS, Durso LE, Brinkman LA, MacDonald T . Weighing obesity stigma. Relative strength of different targets of bias. Int J Obesity 2008; 32: 1145–1152. · DOI
  23. Puhl RM, Latner JL, King K, Luedicke J . Weight bias among professionals who treat eating disorders: associations with attitudes about treatment and perceptions of patient outcomes. Int J Eating Disord 2014; 47: 65–75. · DOI
  24. Foster GD, Wadden TA, Makris AP, Davidson D, Sanderson RS, Allison DB et al. Primary care physicians’ attitudes about obesity and its treatment. Obes Res 2003; 11: 1168–1177. · DOI · Paper page
  25. DePierre JA, Puhl RM, Luedicke J . A new stigmatized identity? Comparisons of a ‘Food Addict’ label with other stigmatized health conditions. Behav Soc Psychol 2013; 35: 10–21.
  26. O'Brien KS, Hunter JA, Halberstadt J, Anderson J . Body image and explicit and implicit anti-fat attitudes: the mediating role of physical appearance comparisons. Body Image 2007; 4: 249–256. · DOI
  27. Falkner NH, French SA, Jeffery RW, Neumark-Sztainer D, Sherwood NE, Morton M . Mistreatment due to weight: prevalence and sources of perceived mistreatment in women and men. Obes Res 1999; 7: 572–576. · DOI
  28. Durso LE, Latner JD . Understanding self-directed stigma: development of the Weight Bias Internalization Scale. Obesity 2008; 16: S80–S86. · DOI
  29. Danielsdottir S, O'Brien KS, Ciao A . Anti-fat prejudice reduction: a review of published studies. Obes Facts 2010; 3: 47–58. · DOI
  30. Tsai AG, Wadden TA . Systematic review: an evaluation of major commercial weight loss programs in the United States. Annals Intern Med 2005; 142: 56–66. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Puhl, R. M., Latner, J. D., O'Brien, K., Luedicke, J., Danielsdottir, S., & Forhan, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Puhl, R M
Venue
International Journal of Obesity
Published
2015-03-20
Volume
39
Issue
7
Pages
1166-1173
ISSN
  • 0307-0565 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5497
OpenAlex
W2128929078
Cited by
315
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 4
FWCI
21.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Rudd Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
weight bias, anti-fat attitudes, weight stigma, fatphobia, sociodemographic predictors, sex differences, social support, cross-national comparison, stigma reduction
MeSH terms
Australia, Body Weight, Canada, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Female, Humans, Iceland, Male, Obesity, Prejudice, Social Perception, Stereotyping, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review