Cited by 93

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Steroid and Ursodesoxycholic Acid Combination Therapy in Severe Drug-Induced Liver Injury

Wree, Alexander, Dechêne, Alexander, Herzer, Kerstin, Hilgard, Phillip, Syn, Wing-Kin, Gerken, Guido, Canbay, Ali·2011·Digestion

Abstract

Background: Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is the leading cause of acute severe liver disease in Western countries. Treatment strategies for DILI are still not well defined. Aim: We studied the safety and outcomes of steroid/ursodesoxycholic acid (UDCA) combination therapy in DILI patients. Patients, Materials and Methods: 15 consecutive patients with severe DILI were analyzed for clinical, biochemical and histological data. Nine patients were treated with a steroid step-down therapy with reduction of the daily dose over several weeks; 6 patients received a steroid pulse therapy for 3 days. UDCA was administered for several weeks in both groups. Results: Patients without histological signs of preexistent liver damage (n = 10) showed the most favorable clinical course. Bilirubin and serum transaminases dropped to <50% of peak values within 2 weeks, and normalized within 4–8 weeks. In contrast, patients with positive autoimmune antibodies (anti-nuclear antibodies and/or soluble liver antigen) and/or histological features of chronic hepatitis (n = 3) exhibited a slower reduction in bilirubin and serum transaminase levels. These patients were given immunosuppressants (steroids, azathioprine) for a further 6 months. Conclusion: Treatment of severe DILI with corticosteroids (both pulse and step-down therapy) and UDCA appears to be safe, and leads to a more rapid reduction in bilirubin and transaminases after DILI.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000322298

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies have suggested that corticosteroids ameliorate liver injury, while others have suggested that they increase adverse events without significant benefits.

    “While some studies have suggested that corticosteroids ameliorate liver injury [187][188][189][190][191], others have suggested that they increase adverse events without significant benefits [192,193].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. 10.1016%2F0168-8278%2890%2990124-A · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1055%2Fs-0029-1240004 · DOI
  3. 10.1016%2FS1089-3261%2805%2970097-0 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1002%2Fhep.20800 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1053%2Fj.gastro.2008.09.011 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1111%2Fj.1365-2796.2007.01818.x · DOI
  7. 10.1111%2Fj.1365-2125.2004.02133.x · DOI
  8. 10.1053%2Fjhep.2002.34857 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1055%2Fs-0028-1109058 · DOI
  10. 10.1002%2Fhep.20948 · DOI
  11. 10.1086%2F381446 · DOI
  12. 10.1007%2FBF01307513 · DOI
  13. 10.1136%2Fgut.20.7.620 · DOI
  14. 10.1053%2Fgast.1996.v111.pm8780577 · DOI
  15. 10.1097%2F00042737-200012030-00017 · DOI
  16. 10.1016%2F0168-8278%2895%2980272-X · DOI
  17. 10.1159%2F000262448 · DOI
  18. 10.1007%2Fs00228-004-0888-z · DOI
  19. 10.1002%2Fhep.23696 · DOI
  20. 10.1016%2FS0168-8278%2800%2980414-6 · DOI
  21. 10.1016%2FS1089-3261%2805%2970094-5 · DOI
  22. 10.1016%2Fj.jhep.2010.04.029 · DOI
  23. 10.1007%2Fs0089480040165 · DOI
  24. 10.1001%2Farchinte.130.4.606 · DOI
  25. 10.3748%2Fwjg.15.1677 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1002%2Fhep.510230326 · DOI
  27. 10.1016%2FS1089-3261%2802%2900025-9 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1111%2Fj.1478-3231.2007.01579.x · DOI
  29. 10.1097%2FMCG.0b013e318188be6d · DOI
  30. 10.3748%2Fwjg.15.2920 · DOI
  31. 10.1097%2F00004836-200210000-00013 · DOI
  32. 10.1016%2F0895-4356%2893%2990101-6 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1016%2F0895-4356%2893%2990102-7 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wree, A., Dechêne, A., Herzer, K., Hilgard, P., Syn, W.-K., Gerken, G., & Canbay, A.
Venue
Digestion
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2011
Volume
84
Issue
1
Pages
54-59
ISSN
  • 0012-2823
  • 1421-9867
Cited by
93
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review