Cited by 25Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

Validation of the Omron M3 Intellisense (HEM-7051-E) Upper Arm Blood Pressure Monitor, for Self-Measurement, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol Revision 2010 in a Stage 3–5 Chronic Kidney Disease Population

Akpolat, Tekin, Erdem, Emre, Aydogdu, Türkan·2012·Kidney and Blood Pressure Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Encouragement of home blood pressure (BP) monitoring has a great potential to improve hypertension control rates. The purpose of this study was to test validation of the Omron M3 Intellisense (HEM-7051-E) upper arm BP measuring monitor for self-measurement according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 (ESH-IP2) in stage 3-5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. METHODS: 66 patients having CKD stage 3-5 were included in the study. Nine consecutive measurements were made according to the ESH-IP2 protocol. RESULTS: The Omron M3 Intellisense device fulfills the validation criteria of the ESH-IP2 for stage 3-5 CKD patients. CONCLUSION: Although arterial stiffness can affect accurate BP measurement, there are limited data regarding the use of automated oscillometric devices in CKD. To our knowledge, this is the first study investigating validation of an oscillometric device in stage 3-5 predialysis CKD patients. This study validates the Omron M3 Intellisense upper arm device for stage 3-5 CKD patients. New validation studies investigating other oscillometric sphygmomanometers for CKD patients and involvement of nephrologists in these studies have great potential to increase patient care in CKD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000330719

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Akpolat, T., Erdem, E., & Aydogdu, T.
Affiliations
Ondokuz Mayıs University (TR)
Venue
Kidney and Blood Pressure Research
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2011-09-10
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
82-88
ISSN
  • 1420-4096 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0143
OpenAlex
W2075785867
Cited by
25
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Kidney & Blood Pressure Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Keywords
home blood pressure monitoring, self-measurement, chronic kidney disease, device validation, arterial stiffness, hypertension control, pre-dialysis CKD
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Arm, Blood Pressure, Europe, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Renal, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Severity of Illness Index, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, Vascular Stiffness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review