CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 639Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyGambling Behavior and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Association between Pathological Internet Use and Comorbid Psychopathology: A Systematic Review

Open access
Carli, V., Durkee, T., Wasserman, D., Hadlaczky, G., Despalins, R., Kramarz, E., Wasserman, C., Sarchiapone, M., Hoven, C.W., Brunner, R., Kaess, M.·2013·Psychopathology
DOI 10.1159/000337971
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Background: Pathological Internet use (PIU) has been conceptualized as an impulse-control disorder that shares characteristics with behavioral addiction. Research has indicated a potential link between PIU and psychopathology; however, the significance of the correlation remains ambiguous. The primary objective of this systematic review was to identify and evaluate studies performed on the correlation between PIU and comorbid psychopathology; the secondary aims were to map the geographical distribution of studies, present a current synthesis of the evidence, and assess the quality of available research. Sampling and Methods: An electronic literature search was conducted using the following databases: MEDLINE, PsycARTICLES, PsychINFO, Global Health, and Web of Science. PIU and known synonyms were included in the search. Data were extracted based on PIU and psychopathology, including depression, anxiety, symptoms of attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), obsessive-compulsive symptoms, social phobia and hostility/aggression. Effect sizes for the correlations observed were identified from either the respective publication or calculated using Cohen’s d or R2. The potential effect of publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot model and evaluated by Egger’s test based on a linear regression. Results: The majority of research was conducted in Asia and comprised cross-sectional designs. Only one prospective study was identified. Twenty articles met the preset inclusion and exclusion criteria; 75% reported significant correlations of PIU with depression, 57% with anxiety, 100% with symptoms of ADHD, 60% with obsessive-compulsive symptoms, and 66% with hostility/aggression. No study reported associations between PIU and social phobia. The majority of studies reported a higher rate of PIU among males than females. The relative risks ranged from an OR of 1.02 to an OR of 11.66. The strongest correlations were observed between PIU and depression; the weakest was hostility/aggression. Conclusions: Depression and symptoms of ADHD appeared to have the most significant and consistent correlation with PIU. Associations were reported to be higher among males in all age groups. Limitations included heterogeneity in the definition and diagnosis of PIU. More studies with prospective designs in Western countries are critically needed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000337971

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 91 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.1111%2Fj.1440-1819.2004.01290.x · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–600 of 638

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Carli, V., Durkee, T., Wasserman, D., Hadlaczky, G., Despalins, R., Kramarz, E., Wasserman, C., Sarchiapone, M., Hoven, C. W., Brunner, R., & Kaess, M.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • University of Molise (IT)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
ORCID
Venue
Psychopathology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2012-07-31
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
1-13
ISSN
  • 0254-4962 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-033X
DOI
10.1159/000337971
OpenAlex
W2036230720
Cited by
639
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 96 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 14
FWCI
13.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi del Molise (submittedVersion)
  • INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • European Commission (223091)
  • Universität Heidelberg
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • Universidad de Oviedo
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
Keywords
internet addiction, comorbid psychopathology, depression, anxiety, ADHD symptoms, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, social anxiety disorder, behavioral addiction, impulse control disorders, sex differences
MeSH terms
Aggression, Anxiety Disorders, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Female, Hostility, Humans, Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders, Male, Comorbidity, Behavior, Addictive, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review