Cited by 1,073Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyGambling Behavior and Treatments

The psychometric properties of the Internet addiction test

Widyanto, Laura, McMurran, Mary·2004·CyberPsychology & Behavior

Abstract

There is growing concern about excessive Internet use and whether this can amount to an addiction. In researching this topic, a valid and reliable assessment instrument is essential. In her survey of Internet addiction, Young designed the Internet Addiction Test (IAT), which provides a basis for developments. The IAT has high face validity, but it has not been subjected to systematic psychometric testing. This study sought to replicate and expand Young's survey, and to examine the IAT more systematically. A questionnaire that existed as a Web page was devised, consisting of the IAT and 15 other questions regarding the respondents' demographic information and Internet usage. Participants were recruited through the Internet, yielding 86 valid responses (29 males and 57 females). Factor analysis of the IAT revealed six factors--salience, excessive use, neglecting work, anticipation, lack of control, and neglecting social life. These factors showed good internal consistency and concurrent validity, with salience being the most reliable. Younger and more recent users reported more problems, mainly concerning the neglect of work and social life. We expected interactive Internet functions to be more addictive; however, this was not found to be so. Overall, the IAT is a valid and reliable instrument that may be used in further research on Internet addiction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cpb.2004.7.443

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Widyanto, L., & McMurran, M.
Affiliations
Cardiff University (GB)
Venue
CyberPsychology & Behavior
Published
2004-08
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
443-450
ISSN
  • 1094-9313 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8364
OpenAlex
W1988157985
Cited by
1,073
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 106 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 77 · 2015: 93 · 2014: 72 · 2013: 74 · 2012: 61
FWCI
38.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CyberPsychology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
Keywords
internet addiction, Internet Addiction Test, psychometric properties, factor structure, salience, lack of control, excessive internet use, questionnaire reliability and validity
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Statistics as Topic, Reproducibility of Results, Behavior, Addictive, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review