Cited by 12Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Insight in psychotic disorder: relation with psychopathology and frontal lobe function

Kumar, Atmesh, Sharma, Pranjal, Das, Shyamanta, Nath, Kamal, Talukdar, Uddip, Bhagabati, Dipesh·2014·Psychopathology

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Through conceptualising poor insight in psychotic disorders as a form of anosognosia, frontal lobe dysfunction is often ascribed a vital role in its pathogenesis. The objective of this study was to compare the relation of insight in patients with psychotic illness to that of psychopathology and frontal lobe function. METHODS: Forty patients with psychotic disorder were selected from those attending the Department of Psychiatry in a tertiary care teaching hospital. The evaluation of insight was carried out using the Schedule for Assessment of Insight (SAI), that of frontal lobe function by the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) and psychopathology by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). The correlation coefficients were determined. RESULTS: A negative correlation between SAI and BPRS scores means that the BPRS score is opposite to SAI scores. When the SAI total score was compared with the FAB total score, the correlation coefficient demonstrated a positive correlation. Better insight predicted lesser psychopathology and also that poor insight would exist with greater psychopathology. Better insight predicted a higher functional status of frontal lobes and prefrontal cortex in particular. CONCLUSION: Insight deficits in schizophrenia and other psychotic illnesses are multidimensional. Integration of different aetiological factors like biological, psychopathological, environmental ones and others are necessary for a better understanding of insight in psychosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000348486

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kumar, A., Sharma, P., Das, S., Nath, K., Talukdar, U., & Bhagabati, D.
Affiliations
Silchar Medical College and Hospital (IN)
Venue
Psychopathology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2013-05-22
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
32-38
ISSN
  • 0254-4962 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-033X
OpenAlex
W2074141036
Cited by
12
References
23
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
insight, psychosis, anosognosia, frontal lobe function, prefrontal cortex, schizophrenia, Frontal Assessment Battery, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, insight deficits
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Psychopathology, Psychotic Disorders, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Prefrontal Cortex, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review