Cited by 66

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of Low and Standard Fluoride Toothpastes on Caries and Fluorosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Santos, A.P.P., Oliveira, B.H., Nadanovsky, P.·2013·Caries Research

Abstract

Although the anti-caries effects of standard fluoride (F) toothpastes are well established, their use by preschoolers (2- to 5-year-olds) has given rise to concerns regarding the development of dental fluorosis. Thus, a widespread support of low F toothpastes has been observed. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of low (<600 ppm) and standard (1,000-1,500 ppm) F toothpastes on the prevention of caries in the primary dentition and aesthetically objectionable (moderate to severe) fluorosis in the permanent dentition. A systematic review of clinical trials and meta-analyses were carried out. Two examiners independently screened 1,932 records and read 159 potentially eligible full-text articles. Data regarding characteristics of participants, interventions, outcomes, length of follow-up and potential of bias were independently extracted by two examiners and disagreements were solved by consensus after consulting a third examiner. In order to assess the effects of low and standard F toothpastes on the proportion of children developing caries and fluorosis, pooled relative risks (RR) and associated 95% confidence intervals were estimated using a fixed and a random-effects model, respectively. Five clinical trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Low F toothpastes significantly increased the risk of caries in primary teeth [RR = 1.13 (1.07-1.20); 4,634 participants in three studies] and did not significantly decrease the risk of aesthetically objectionable fluorosis in the upper anterior permanent teeth [RR = 0.32 (0.03-2.97); 1,968 participants in two studies]. There is no evidence to support the use of low F toothpastes by preschoolers regarding caries and fluorosis prevention.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000348492

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. 10.1159%2F000069022 · DOI
  2. 10.1177%2F154411130201300206 · DOI
  3. 10.1038%2Fsj.bdj.4800140a · DOI
  4. 10.1159%2F000073916 · DOI
  5. 10.1111%2Fj.1600-0528.2010.00577.x · DOI
  6. 10.1080%2F000163598422956 · DOI
  7. 10.1111%2Fj.1600-0528.2009.00507.x · DOI
  8. 10.1590%2FS0034-89102002000600009 · DOI
  9. 10.1177%2F154405910408301S26 · DOI
  10. 10.1111%2Fj.1600-0528.2004.00136.x · DOI
  11. 10.1111%2Fj.1600-0528.2004.00139.x · DOI
  12. 10.1177%2F154405910508401208 · DOI
  13. 10.1111%2Fj.1752-7325.2007.00036.x · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1177%2F154405910708600807 · DOI
  15. 10.1111%2Fj.1600-0528.2007.00314.x · DOI
  16. 10.1007%2FBF03262679 · DOI
  17. 10.1159%2F000346006 · DOI
  18. 10.1111%2Fj.1600-0528.2004.00164.x · DOI
  19. 10.1034%2Fj.1600-0528.2000.028005321.x · DOI
  20. 10.1159%2F000322132 · DOI
  21. 10.1136%2Fbmj.313.7048.36 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1159%2F000111749 · DOI
  23. 10.1177%2F154407370802000102 · DOI
  24. 10.1016%2Fj.jclinepi.2010.03.004 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1590%2FS1806-83242007000300008 · DOI
  26. 10.1159%2F000077769 · DOI
  27. 10.1034%2Fj.1600-0528.2002.300310.x · DOI
  28. 10.1590%2FS0102-311X2010000700025 · DOI
  29. 10.1111%2Fj.1365-263X.2011.01115.x · DOI
  30. 10.1111%2Fj.1600-0528.2004.00137.x · DOI
  31. 10.1111%2Fj.1365-263X.1995.tb00154.x · DOI
  32. 10.1034%2Fj.1600-0528.2002.300110.x · DOI
  33. 10.1159%2F000088909 · DOI
  34. 10.1177%2F154405910808701105 · DOI
  35. 10.1080%2F00016350310007590 · DOI
  36. 10.1080%2F00016350600555537 · DOI
  37. 10.1159%2F000320364 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Santos, A. P. P., Oliveira, B. H., & Nadanovsky, P.
Venue
Caries Research
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2013
Volume
47
Issue
5
Pages
382-390
ISSN
  • 0008-6568
  • 1421-976X
Cited by
66
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review