Cited by 36Medication Adherence and ComplianceAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementPharmacy and Medical Practices

Barriers and facilitators for medication adherence in stroke patients: A qualitative study conducted in french neurological rehabilitation units

Bauler, Stephanie, Jacquin-Courtois, Sophie, Haesebaert, Julie, Luaute, Jacques, Coudeyre, Emmanuel, Feutrier, Corinne, Allenet, Benoit, Decullier, Evelyne +2 more·2014·European Neurology

Abstract

Objective: To describe the perceptions of French patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals on stroke and secondary preventive medications. Method: A qualitative study was conducted, based on four predetermined topics: stroke, secondary prevention medications, patient's experience, relationship between patient/caregiver and healthcare team. Results: Twenty-six interviews were conducted. Difficulties in taking medications, lack of knowledge on stroke and medication benefits, fear of overmedication were identified as barriers for adherence in patients. Doubts about generic drugs were expressed by caregivers. Healthcare professionals reported lack of knowledge and absence of clinical symptoms as barriers. On the other hand, support from caregivers and healthcare professional support is essential for compliance in all participants. Patients and caregivers expressed that fear of recurrence was a facilitator for treatment compliance. Conclusion: This study highlights the barriers and facilitators for stroke treatment adherence and underlines the similarities and differences between the perceptions of patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals. These results must be integrated into the future French educational programs to improve medication adherence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000362718

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bauler, S., Jacquin-Courtois, S., Haesebaert, J., Luaute, J., Coudeyre, E., Feutrier, C., Allenet, B., Decullier, E., Rode, G., & Janoly-Dumenil, A.
Affiliations
  • Hospices Civils de Lyon (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand (FR)
Venue
European Neurology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2014
Volume
72
Issue
5-6
Pages
262-270
ISSN
  • 0014-3022 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9913
OpenAlex
W2019054333
Cited by
36
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
Keywords
medication adherence, stroke, secondary prevention, barriers and facilitators, patient perspectives, caregiver perceptions, healthcare professional perceptions, generic drugs, fear of recurrence, caregiver support, caregiver-patient relationship, patient education
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, Adult, Aged, Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, France, Health Personnel, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Professional-Patient Relations, Caregivers, Stroke, Qualitative Research, Medication Adherence, Secondary Prevention, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review