Cited by 91Pharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismHealth Policy Implementation ScienceArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

An Index of Barriers for the Implementation of Personalised Medicine and Pharmacogenomics in Europe

Horgan, Denis, Jansen, Marleen, Leyens, Lada, Lal, Jonathan A., Sudbrak, Ralf, Hackenitz, Erica, Bußhoff, Ulrike, Ballensiefen, Wolfgang +1 more·2014·Public Health Genomics

Abstract

Background: Personalised medicine (PM) is an innovative way to produce better patient outcomes by using an individualised or stratified approach to disease and treatment rather than a collective treatment approach for patients. Despite its tangible advantages, the complex process to translate PM into the member states and European healthcare systems has delayed its uptake. The aim of this study is to identify relevant barriers represented by an index to summarise challenging areas for the implementation of PM in Europe. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted, and a gaps-and-needs assessment together with a strengths-weaknesses-opportunities-and-threats analysis were applied to review strategic reports and conduct interviews with key stakeholders. Furthermore, surveys were sent out to representatives of stakeholder groups. The index was constructed based on the priorisation of relevant factors by stakeholders. Results: A need for stakeholder-agreed standards at all levels of implementation of PM exists, from validating biomarkers to definitions of ‘informed consent'. The barriers to implement PM are identified in 7 areas, namely, stakeholder involvement, standardisation, interoperable infrastructure, European-level policy making, funding, data and research, and healthcare systems. Conclusions: Challenges in the above-mentioned areas can and must be successfully tackled if we are to create a healthier Europe through PM. In order to create an environment in which PM can thrive for the patients' best outcomes, there is an urgent need for systematic actions to remove as many barriers as possible.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000368034

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Europe, precision medicine is considered by researchers, healthcare providers and patient representatives to have limited availability because only a few programs are already in place.

    “In Europe as well, where healthcare is primarily funded through government-regulated public health insurance systems, taxpayers and private insurance policies [111, 112], PM is considered by researchers, healthcare providers and patient representatives to have limited availability. This is because only a few programs are already in place. [58].”
  • Many health care providers need further education in precision medicine or genomic medicine.

    “These and other studies [37, 44–47, 58, 86, 105–108] reveal the need for further education of many health care providers, however, this requirement may vary between professionals in different fields [53, 81].”
  • Interpreting multiomics, clinical and lifestyle data becomes complicated by inadequate validation of biomarkers and insufficient evidence of clinical utility, which leads to clinical uncertainty.

    “However, interpreting multiomics, clinical and lifestyle data becomes complicated by inadequate validation of biomarkers and insufficient evidence of clinical utility, which leads to clinical uncertainty [58].”
  • A study from Europe reports a certain reluctance on the part of health insurers to cover the costs for PM, as the evidence is insufficient and incentives too small.

    “And indeed a study from Europe reports a certain reluctance on the part of health insurers to cover the costs for PM, as the evidence is insufficient and incentives too small [58].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Horgan, D., Jansen, M., Leyens, L., Lal, J. A., Sudbrak, R., Hackenitz, E., Bußhoff, U., Ballensiefen, W., & Brand, A.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics (DE)
  • ZonMw, The Dutch Organisation for knowledge and innovation in health, healthcare and well-being (NL)
  • Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
Venue
Public Health Genomics
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2014
Volume
17
Issue
5-6
Pages
287-298
ISSN
  • 1422-2795 (ISSN-L)
  • 1662-4246
  • 1662-8063
OpenAlex
W2042621864
Cited by
91
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 4
FWCI
13.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Public Health Genomics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Seventh Framework Programme
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
personalized medicine, pharmacogenomics, implementation barriers, European health systems, stakeholder engagement, standardization, biomarker validation, informed consent, health policy, funding, health care system
MeSH terms
Attitude to Health, Data Collection, Delivery of Health Care, Europe, Female, Genetic Markers, Humans, Pharmacogenetics, Policy Making, Public Policy, Public Health Practice, Precision Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review